30 Mins to decide!

Started by RaisyDaisy, March 22, 2014, 03:59:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

RaisyDaisy

I kept Suckling. I know there will be plenty of games like today where he scores like a rookie, but it was his JS, coupled with the uncertainty of the rookies JS which is why I kept him. Probably could have picked Webster for the same reason, but ended up going with Suckers

HotTiges

Happy? Looks like he hasn't missed a beat..

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: HotTiges on March 22, 2014, 07:21:53 PM
Happy? Looks like he hasn't missed a beat..

You know what your going to get with Suckling. Most games between 65-85, a few real stinkers and few great scores, so for his price but more so his JS I am happy :)

If guys like Langdon, Georgiou, Langford and McDonald get dropped in a few weeks time, then it will make this choice much more satisfying :)

HotTiges

Yeah.i expect a vest or two.even a rest but looks good.. Rookies all looked good this round..

Grufflez

Yeah don't see Langdon or Langford getting dropped tbh....McDonald a real chance/sub...Point was like i said if you had been wanting to downgrade Suckers to a rookie like Langdon or Langford i would have voted yes...but not Georgiou and it proved wise ^^

crowls

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 22, 2014, 07:27:08 PM
Quote from: HotTiges on March 22, 2014, 07:21:53 PM
Happy? Looks like he hasn't missed a beat..

You know what your going to get with Suckling. Most games between 65-85, a few real stinkers and few great scores, so for his price but more so his JS I am happy :)

If guys like Langdon, Georgiou, Langford and McDonald get dropped in a few weeks time, then it will make this choice much more satisfying :)

I downgraded suckers to Webster before game as I figure likely to get same scores and js for less money.  looked at dropping mcd but couldn't risk it and had dunston on m10.  lets see how mcd goes.   most likely to up trade clurey before anyone else.

RaisyDaisy

Now looking in hindsight I think the result was breakeven

Georgiou didn't score huge, but played well and should get games for a while - Garland returning the only threat

Langford and Langdon have very good JS IMO, only Cyril, Lake and Stratton are returning for Hawks over next few weeks and guys like O'Brien, Cheney and Wanganeen will go before Langford. I honestly think Sewell is not a straight up walk back into the team

McDonald I expect to play most of the season too, and considering how shower North was he will only get better, so having Suckling at D5, then McDonald, Langford and Langdon I feel really good - I've nailed the right choices and don't even care about Laidler as he cant fit into my team anyway

As long as I don't continue to have the highest scoring rookies on the bench like I did this week (Langdon and Dunstan) I think I am in pretty good shape