30 Mins to decide!

[RaisyDaisy]

Don't really do polls but need to make a call within the next 30 mins

Mitchell, Hibberd, Simpson, Enright, Suckling, McDonald (Langford, Langdon)

Do I keep Suckers and pass on Georgiou, or because I already have 4 premo defenders do I do the downgrade, and then field Langford and put Georgiou on bench?

Thanks in advance!  :)

[Daniel123]

Depends what your doing with the money

[HotTiges]

Don't mind it in your situation.splash cash elsewhere.still think suckers will go alright.your taking the punt on georgiou not being a sub(doubt it) so you should be fine

[Grufflez]

If you were asking to downgrade to Langford id say yes, but i don't like Georgiou's JS when Garland comes back in 2-3 weeks...unless you think Mitch Clarke going out in some way helps him i reckon he might be dropped on Garlands return

[GCSkiwi]

I would say keep suckers purely for JS - much harder for him to lose his gig than Georgiou. Playing > not playing +200k

[fever]

imagine georgiou only has a few weeks in him with garland due back

edit: posted wiothout looking. ecactly what grufflez said. wish i took my own advice though. i dont really have any options to turn him into anyone. hopefully he can go huge til he gets dropped and make 100k

[AaronKirk]

Keep suckers at D5 if you happy with the rest of your side. Really depends what you would use the cash for.

[Samm79]

If you were asking to downgrade to Langford id say yes, but i don't like Georgiou's JS when Garland comes back in 2-3 weeks...unless you think Mitch Clarke going out in some way helps him i reckon he might be dropped on Garlands return

Is Langford's JS any better?

[RaisyDaisy]

Thanks Lads

I have no use for the cash. I could upgrade Hickey to NicNat but I am happy to start with Hickey. I would only bank the cash and use it in the future for upgrades eg/ getting Jobe or Jelwood

My thought for doing this is, theres every chance Langford and Suckers could average the same, so might as well pocket the cash, but on the flipside the element of risk slightly increases because all those 4 rookies could get dropped in a few weeks

Think I will play it safe. Looks like Suckers keeps his spot

[Daniel123]

Do you have money from your downgrade to hickey lands you could upgarde a mid rookie to rocky

[Sabretooth Tigers]

 8)
How about Suckers to Webster and pocket 70k ?  It's what I've done, I want spare cash over the first 3 rounds for the " unpredictables ".  Best of luck mate.    :)

[Big Mac]

You rate Langford's JS?

[RaisyDaisy]

The only thing that has annoyed me now, is that up until this morning I was downgrading Suckling, and that's why I fielded LMac last night, but now that I am most likely keeping Suckers, I could have fielded Langford and benched LMac like I had planned. Grrrrr!

Nah cant upgrade anyone else except Hickey

Argh! I keep changing my mind LOL, Suckling is safer as some of these rookies could get dropped in a few weeks time, but if the rookies score well and are on my bench that is frustrating. Gotta take the good with the bad I guess, think I'll keep Suckers - not really interested in Webster, the 70k isn't important, and Suckers will be very easy to upgrade later, or could even turn into a keeper

[Grufflez]

If you were asking to downgrade to Langford id say yes, but i don't like Georgiou's JS when Garland comes back in 2-3 weeks...unless you think Mitch Clarke going out in some way helps him i reckon he might be dropped on Garlands return

Is Langford's JS any better?

Yes i believe it is a lot better unless he goes and plays a few absolute stinkers.

[Grufflez]

Mate Suckers should make a 100k anyway so i see it as JS + 100K VS Possible 200-250k but likely to be dropped..Stay with Suckling, Georgiou would have to hit Beast Mode for the next 3 weeks to even have a chance at keeping Garland out.