Webster to Langford next week field Langdon yes or no

Started by whynot102, March 21, 2014, 07:05:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

whynot102


vmac66


Kenny27


tigertops


hawkers65

Yes, i'd do it, i personally had Webster heading into Round 1 but downgraded him when all the valid rookie options. Go for it! Dont get caught with Langdon though! Extremely unlikely to back it up and Langford is a chance to average similar if not better.

frenzy


juzztheball

Quote from: frenzy on March 21, 2014, 11:45:35 PM
go for it, burn them trades, buddy

It's still a free trade you brain surgeon...

Im tempted to do this, but im not convinced Langford can hold his spot with the likes of Lake and Schoenmakers to come back into the side

Grufflez

I think Langford will play a lot this year.. a few of those Hawks aint getting any younger..Hodgey,Mitchell,Sewell...they need to get games into blokes like langford and watch Shiels go nuts!

SydneyRox

Quote from: juzztheball on March 22, 2014, 10:59:56 AM
Quote from: frenzy on March 21, 2014, 11:45:35 PM
go for it, burn them trades, buddy

It's still a free trade you brain surgeon...

Im tempted to do this, but im not convinced Langford can hold his spot with the likes of Lake and Schoenmakers to come back into the side

no need to get personal. am sure he was thinking langdon.

imo webster is a much better option, although seeing langford named on the ball does intrigue me. not that everyone plays where theyare named...


juzztheball


SydneyRox

Quote from: juzztheball on March 22, 2014, 11:29:05 AM
Personal?  ???

brain surgeon, you brain surgeon.  :P

read it like you were having a go, not sarcasm.

djbics