Main Menu

Nic Nat

Started by BlackOrWhite, March 21, 2014, 06:53:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jackross10

Minson vs Nic Nat?

Bully

Quote from: Jackross10 on March 23, 2014, 12:47:52 PM
Minson vs Nic Nat?

Minson, Nic Nat is odds on to get subbed.

Jackross10

Quote from: Bully on March 23, 2014, 12:49:19 PM
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 23, 2014, 12:47:52 PM
Minson vs Nic Nat?

Minson, Nic Nat is odds on to get subbed.

Mm I can afford any ruck. Think I'll go Minno now. Cox and NIC are tempting tho.

lukebomber

I missed the game last night, should I be concerned with his terrible score? was he underdone or was it due to the fact three rucks were played?

SydneyRox

I am sticking with him, he looked a little underdone, did some flashy things, but (and I didnt watch the whole game) seemed like they were hiding him in the fwd line a lot. Surely they wont hold Sinclair in the team, he was there for insurance? Which should increase the bounces that Nic Nat attends

auscoyote

I don't know, Sinclair might be part of Simpson's plan. He played alright too. All the tall's hurt Kennedy's scoring as well. For the teams sake i dont mind them trialing the Sinclair move :), but for my SC team it Sux >:(

I will still keep the the great leaping palm tree but for those that dont have him, they will get a great advantage of saving cash and getting him in when his tank is back up to scratch and ready to explode in hopefully a few weeks time.

kilbluff1985

of course he was under done lol was his first game in ages

roti

Surely everyone who picked him couldn't expect him to start pumping out 120's from round 1, he's gonna take a bit of time

Bully

No preseason means he will be rusty for the next few matches. It may even mean that WC play 3 talls for the next month or so, which will impact upon both Cox & Nicnat.

billnats

I got him from the start because I want him at the end... saves me a trade

auscoyote

Quote from: billnats on March 24, 2014, 02:04:35 PM
I got him from the start because I want him at the end... saves me a trade
Yep me too and i knew he would be underdone but was hoping that because he is such a freak that maybe he wouldn't need a full preseason ;D
The mid pricer scheme and then upgrade to him, could of been the way to go. Time will tell but no regrets as my team wouldn't be the same without him.

bowyanger

Quote from: billnats on March 24, 2014, 02:04:35 PM
I got him from the start because I want him at the end... saves me a trade

probably the most intelligent thing Ive read on this website for a fair while

Vinny

Quote from: bowyanger on March 24, 2014, 08:23:50 PM
Quote from: billnats on March 24, 2014, 02:04:35 PM
I got him from the start because I want him at the end... saves me a trade

probably the most intelligent thing Ive read on this website for a fair while
Obviously haven't read my "hahaha" posts.  :P

blues123

Quote from: Vinny on March 24, 2014, 08:25:04 PM
Quote from: bowyanger on March 24, 2014, 08:23:50 PM
Quote from: billnats on March 24, 2014, 02:04:35 PM
I got him from the start because I want him at the end... saves me a trade

probably the most intelligent thing Ive read on this website for a fair while
Obviously haven't read my "hahaha" posts.  :P
+1

Danzac

I thought NicNat looked awesome. I'll be a buyer if I can afford him in a few weeks