anyone rolling without luke mcdonald?

Started by eaglesman, March 21, 2014, 06:35:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

hawkers65

Quote from: Dayze on March 21, 2014, 11:26:59 PM
Anyone else thinking bout downgrading there r2 and running with currie as r2 in 3 weeks? Or am I getting carried away haha

Just a bit carried away :P Its just good we have cover now! Espcially for me as i'm rocking the Hickylands combo!

HotTiges

Haha wait for confirmation of Goldyhorn news first!

_wato

Yeah perfect cover as Hawkers mentioned.

If Goldy is indeed out for a few weeks it creates great insurance for Nic Nat and makes me feel much more comfortable in his selection.

Bully

Quote from: Dayze on March 21, 2014, 11:26:59 PM
Anyone else thinking bout downgrading there r2 and running with currie as r2 in 3 weeks? Or am I getting carried away haha

The three pronged Hickey/Sandi/Hmac model is now officially obsolete.

fever

if going for league only i could conceive holding goldy for a few weeks to see how currie goes as #1 ruck, with an eye to holding him until his return if currie can average 80-90+

HotTiges

Probably not a complete disaster but if you have Currie as R3 and have Goldy you could hold.. Lose quite a few points but save a trade..Surely Goldy owners had Currie as R3

hawkers65

Quote from: Bully on March 21, 2014, 11:34:51 PM
Quote from: Dayze on March 21, 2014, 11:26:59 PM
Anyone else thinking bout downgrading there r2 and running with currie as r2 in 3 weeks? Or am I getting carried away haha

The three pronged Hickey/Sandi/Hmac model is now officially obsolete.

Sucks for Richo! The only coach i know running with it...

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: HotTiges on March 21, 2014, 11:38:15 PM
Probably not a complete disaster but if you have Currie as R3 and have Goldy you could hold.. Lose quite a few points but save a trade..Surely everyone had Currie as R3

FYP

AaronKirk

Will be looking intently to who to bring in to replace Goldstein if he is out. If the circumstance arises off what I have seen in round one i'd definitely will be looking at Mumford and the rucks who play this weekend (Leuey, Big Boy, Nic Nat, Cox)

Bully

Quote from: hawkers65 on March 21, 2014, 11:39:52 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 21, 2014, 11:34:51 PM
Quote from: Dayze on March 21, 2014, 11:26:59 PM
Anyone else thinking bout downgrading there r2 and running with currie as r2 in 3 weeks? Or am I getting carried away haha

The three pronged Hickey/Sandi/Hmac model is now officially obsolete.

Sucks for Richo! The only coach i know running with it...

I guess one can still hold but with King as a loophole, it means Currie would need to be traded in. 200k vs 1 trade, I think it's a worthy corrective trade.

Spite

I have hampson/hickey/sandi combo so really hoping goldy has a quick recovery. If no one has a rookie ruck playing during the byes, thats where I plan to catch up on some points :)

hawkers65

Quote from: Spite on March 21, 2014, 11:52:24 PM
I have hampson/hickey/sandi combo so really hoping goldy has a quick recovery. If no one has a rookie ruck playing during the byes, thats where I plan to catch up on some points :)

WOW! thats an expensive line! You would be one of a few to actually hope Currie doesn't get up!

Spite

Quote from: hawkers65 on March 21, 2014, 11:58:07 PM
Quote from: Spite on March 21, 2014, 11:52:24 PM
I have hampson/hickey/sandi combo so really hoping goldy has a quick recovery. If no one has a rookie ruck playing during the byes, thats where I plan to catch up on some points :)

WOW! thats an expensive line! You would be one of a few to actually hope Currie doesn't get up!

Haha actually I started with goldy and sandi with currie and max king like most people. By going goldy to hickey and currie to hampson, I actually saved about 80k. That and I get to loophole for a ruck score each week and get an extra player during the bye round. Too early to tell if it was a good move but for round 1 it looked to be a success with hampson tonning up. :)

crowls

Quote from: Samm79 on March 21, 2014, 07:52:01 PM
I just cannot justify spending that money on a rookie that is probably not going to be a top 3 rookie, there are other options that will score probably just as well, and you can save $70K. Same with Tyson.

almost dropped him for aish in my mids.    will probably td simpson to swallow next week.   only chicken s]]ted at last moment and dropped him for simmo.   going to swap out mcd at r3 as I agree likely 70 ptr at best and recok aish or lower price rookie will pay off better

Bully

Quote from: crowls on March 22, 2014, 11:58:55 AM
Quote from: Samm79 on March 21, 2014, 07:52:01 PM
I just cannot justify spending that money on a rookie that is probably not going to be a top 3 rookie, there are other options that will score probably just as well, and you can save $70K. Same with Tyson.

almost dropped him for aish in my mids.    will probably td simpson to swallow next week.   only chicken s]]ted at last moment and dropped him for simmo.   going to swap out mcd at r3 as I agree likely 70 ptr at best and recok aish or lower price rookie will pay off better

Why trade Simpson to Swallow? Do you believe Swallow will outscore him over the course of the season?