Main Menu

Hibberd

Started by BigMac_93, March 21, 2014, 03:35:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

BigMac_93

Had him locked in my team until he did his hammy. Now that he is back I am tempted to pick him over Hanley. Will be a good POD but may be a risk given he may not be 100%.

Thoughts?

shaker

Scores well but but when injured it always seems to be a hammy

shorty3264

I'd be careful. He will be a POD, but I don't think the Bombers would be playing him if he wasn't very very close to fully fit, surely wouldn't risk him for round 1.

GoLions

You'd expect them to both average around the same, but Hibberd has the injury risk, so I'd go with Hanley

AaronKirk

I'd go Hanley over Hibberd. If you start with Hibberd, expect him to be subbed tonight.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: AaronKirk on March 21, 2014, 03:51:08 PM
I'd go Hanley over Hibberd. If you start with Hibberd, expect him to be subbed tonight.

Really?

They always said it was a light hammy injury - not major - and if he is named to play and plays, surely he is no chance of getting subbed

I'm sticking with him - looks like he will be a nice POD

AaronKirk

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 21, 2014, 03:52:37 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on March 21, 2014, 03:51:08 PM
I'd go Hanley over Hibberd. If you start with Hibberd, expect him to be subbed tonight.

Really?

They always said it was a light hammy injury - not major - and if he is named to play and plays, surely he is no chance of getting subbed

I'm sticking with him - looks like he will be a nice POD

Hibberd still not 100% to play tonight. Has a history of soft-tissue injuries. We will be very careful with him.

Baggers2012

I think i might go with him. For me, it's Thompson V Hibberd. By getting Hibberd i can get Currie as R3

Essentially it comes to this for me:

S.Thompson & Ruckman under 120k (nobody that will play)

M.Hibberd & D.Currie

Thoughts?

hawkers65

I'm thinking Hodge over Hibberd/Hanley  :o

Baggers2012

Quote from: hawkers65 on March 21, 2014, 04:20:33 PM
I'm thinking Hodge over Hibberd/Hanley  :o

Does the R9 bye bother you? the main reason i don't have him.

jfitty

Quote from: Baggers2012 on March 21, 2014, 04:07:07 PM
I think i might go with him. For me, it's Thompson V Hibberd. By getting Hibberd i can get Currie as R3

Essentially it comes to this for me:

S.Thompson & Ruckman under 120k (nobody that will play)

M.Hibberd & D.Currie

Thoughts?

What other defenders do you have? I think it's worth having Currie on the bench if you can fit him in!