Thoughts on Downgrading Suckling to Langford?

Started by E-Lemon_ator, March 21, 2014, 09:29:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: felsty on March 21, 2014, 03:13:17 PM
Have gone this way too but also have Laidler on the ground.
Interesting would have to see your team.
Personally I have NicNat in right now to save the trade. I don't think it will take him long at all reach scoring potential.

Yeah if I downgrade Suckers to Georgiou the only option I have is Hickey to NicNat. Saving the trade could be the decision in my possibly upgrading Hickey.. Still have 24 hours to think about it, but I am more than happy to dump Suckers because the 4 rookies I have would be plenty, and could even get Laidler later if one of them turned into a spud

MontyJnr

Final teams has Langford starting on the bench and not on the ball as first listed.

Bully

Quote from: MontyJnr on March 22, 2014, 03:50:27 PM
Final teams has Langford starting on the bench and not on the ball as first listed.

The team lists mean nothing, he's not sub and that's all that matters.

E-Lemon_ator

So my decision to go with Langford rather than Suckers worked well for me this week.
77 for Langford & Suckling 72.
See how It pans out over the next few weeks

tommy10

Don't want to jump the gun just yet....will see how Suckling goes next week the if he gets another 70 odd points, then will downgrade to Langford (also depends on his score, sub,etc) or Laidler. Then upgrade crouch to Tyson.