Suckling -> KK

Started by smashbox, March 19, 2014, 08:21:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Dayze on March 19, 2014, 10:49:03 PM
plan on ditching KK before the byes? another rnd 8er isn't ideal

Should be OK I think

Most common Rd8 players would be Danger/McDonald/Currie/Ablett/Cotchin/Pendles/Beams/Langdon/Caddy/Enright. Prob throw in Goldy for some too, but the likes of KK, Currie, McDonald. Langdon and Caddy could be traded by then so I think KK down back is OK, but obv depends on your team

kilbluff1985

Quote from: Dayze on March 19, 2014, 10:49:03 PM
plan on ditching KK before the byes? another rnd 8er isn't ideal

not an issue for me

Byes: 2/3/3 - 3/3/4 - 1/1/2 - 2/1/5 = 8/8/14 (in the format of R8/R9/R10)

is my current structure

a few round 10 rookies which i plan to upgrade before round 10 it's a different strategy to most but works well

Fid

If Laidler plays well next week I will be trading out Clurey for him.  KK might still be a few weeks off

Knowall

Why dont u do Suckling to Webster.  If youre expecting 80 from Suckling (I reckon it could be less and think hes a sub/subbed option early on) why not go for Webster.  Since Webster is 70k cheaper he can average less to make the same amount of money.  Which if we arent thinking Suckling is a keeper the amount of money we make is our major concern.

I currently have Suckling and im in the same boat so these are pretty much my thoughts which are spinning in my head typed out.

smashbox

Ye that actually makes alot of sense, especially if webster is playing Melb this week why not keep that 70 in the bank and if they are to average around the same Webster will make more cash in that first price rise.

Both i dont think are keepers so think it might be smarter to go webster instead of suckling

tommy10

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 19, 2014, 10:58:29 PM
Quote from: Dayze on March 19, 2014, 10:49:03 PM
plan on ditching KK before the byes? another rnd 8er isn't ideal

Should be OK I think

Most common Rd8 players would be Danger/McDonald/Currie/Ablett/Cotchin/Pendles/Beams/Langdon/Caddy/Enright. Prob throw in Goldy for some too, but the likes of KK, Currie, McDonald. Langdon and Caddy could be traded by then so I think KK down back is OK, but obv depends on your team

Yeah I don't have any other round 8 players except for Langdon and McDonald so KK in depending on his form, etc. for one of Langdon/McDonald and upgrade the other. Suckling would be the only one left to upgrade unless he kills it.

cotch9

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 19, 2014, 08:42:44 PM
just on this though my defense rookies are Laidler, Langdon, Clurey

so if Clurey struggles the next 2 rounds and KK does well will take the one price rise out of Clurey and upgrade him to KK

Will obviously need money in the bank for this

will prob do it regardless of how Clurey goes actually

How much do you reckon Clurey's first price rise will be?

tkringle

Quote from: tommy10 on March 20, 2014, 01:45:42 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 19, 2014, 10:58:29 PM
Quote from: Dayze on March 19, 2014, 10:49:03 PM
plan on ditching KK before the byes? another rnd 8er isn't ideal

Should be OK I think

Most common Rd8 players would be Danger/McDonald/Currie/Ablett/Cotchin/Pendles/Beams/Langdon/Caddy/Enright. Prob throw in Goldy for some too, but the likes of KK, Currie, McDonald. Langdon and Caddy could be traded by then so I think KK down back is OK, but obv depends on your team

Yeah I don't have any other round 8 players except for Langdon and McDonald so KK in depending on his form, etc. for one of Langdon/McDonald and upgrade the other. Suckling would be the only one left to upgrade unless he kills it.

Your going to burn a trade to get KK in for Langdon or McDonald?!