Matty Crouch not named..

Started by HotTiges, March 19, 2014, 06:32:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

HotTiges

Not named but is an emergency...what you lads doing? Hold at M10 or move on?

RaisyDaisy

Started a thread at same time but just deleted it :)

My Jayden Hunt theory is more or less a lock for me now

GoldDigger

Quote from: HotTiges on March 19, 2014, 06:32:38 PM
Not named but is an emergency...what you lads doing? Hold at M10 or move on?

Moved on last week.

HotTiges

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 19, 2014, 06:34:59 PM
Started a thread at same time but just deleted it :)

My Jayden Hunt theory is more or less a lock for me now
Yeah that was strange lol. From a non Langdon type of movement, just thinking what I'm going to do.will def get games but do we go for a rd 1 rook.wont need Crouch this round and Dunsten is m9..

RaisyDaisy

An idea a lot of people can go with is moving LMac to M10 and picking up Georgiou or Langford to replace him down back, and you can always move LMac back to def in a couple of weeks time

HotTiges

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 19, 2014, 06:39:40 PM
An idea a lot of people can go with is moving LMac to M10 and picking up Georgiou or Langford to replace him down back, and you can always move LMac back to def in a couple of weeks time
Interesting.
Last 2 backs starters, will look a little thin .. Langdon Langford/Georgiou hmm

Jroo

Just like Brad last year, still should be a good pick.
Happy I went with Cunningham though

HotTiges

Quote from: JROO8 on March 19, 2014, 06:45:24 PM
Just like Brad last year, still should be a good pick.
Happy I went with Cunningham though
Saw ya twitter quote ya barbie  :P yeah I was thinking Cunningham was a good pick.. Stayed away grr

AaronKirk

I thought that M.Crouch would be named but once Cunningham was not the sub I selected him as M10.

Jroo

Quote from: HotTiges on March 19, 2014, 06:47:00 PM
Quote from: JROO8 on March 19, 2014, 06:45:24 PM
Just like Brad last year, still should be a good pick.
Happy I went with Cunningham though
Saw ya twitter quote ya barbie  :P yeah I was thinking Cunningham was a good pick.. Stayed away grr
Haha  ;) :P
The Swans like Cunningham, they need to inject some pace into their midfield.

sammy123

Quote from: JROO8 on March 19, 2014, 06:56:46 PM
Quote from: HotTiges on March 19, 2014, 06:47:00 PM
Quote from: JROO8 on March 19, 2014, 06:45:24 PM
Just like Brad last year, still should be a good pick.
Happy I went with Cunningham though
Saw ya twitter quote ya barbie  :P yeah I was thinking Cunningham was a good pick.. Stayed away grr
Haha  ;) :P
The Swans like Cunningham, they need to inject some pace into their midfield.


Picked him Too :)

Bully

I'm still going to select him, this could actually make him a decent POD now. Happy to use him for loophole purposes in the meantime.

Jimmykidd

god damnit. flower this split round.

Jroo

Quote from: Bully on March 19, 2014, 06:59:10 PM
I'm still going to select him, this could actually make him a decent POD now. Happy to use him for loophole purposes in the meantime.
As long as he's named in the next few weeks you'll be fine.

Bully

Quote from: JROO8 on March 19, 2014, 07:00:43 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 19, 2014, 06:59:10 PM
I'm still going to select him, this could actually make him a decent POD now. Happy to use him for loophole purposes in the meantime.
As long as he's named in the next few weeks you'll be fine.

It's a bit of a gamble but I figure he'll make an appearance in the next few weeks. Sando indicated he's next in line so maybe he'll be selected for next week's derby.