The Good, The Bad and The Ugly - Week 1/Round 1

Started by Keeper27, March 17, 2014, 08:04:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

BoredSaint

Quote from: fever on March 17, 2014, 10:31:06 AM
putting rohan in ugly shows a fundamental lack of understanding about how this game works

edit: @love4thegame and jackross, ur ok doc ;)
couldnt agree more.. you play rookies hoping that they score like 50 which both rohan and mcdonough got around and the saved cash meant i could pick a fyfe instead of daisy which earned me an extra 60 points

AaronKirk

1490/13 (c) not too bad but could have been better

Good:
Ablett 140x2
Beams 136
Sandi 127
Fyfe 122
Cotchin 118
Langdon on field 111
Polec 107
Simpson 105
M.Johnson 104
Martin 102
Wingard 100

Bad:
Laidler 95 on bench

Rohan and Clurey on field  :'(

Ugly:
Nothing too ugly... yet

dmac07

1066/9


GOOD
Ablett 140
Pendlebury 127 (C)
Beams 136
Polec 107
Sandi 127
Martin 102
Grundy 80
Shaw 85 (borderline good/bad)
Langdon 111 (on bench)


BAD
Lemmens 37 (on bench.. but still)

UGLY
.. Cloke 35

Outside cloke pretty happy

SydneyRox

Good: Swallow, Simpson, Pendles (C), Sandi,i Beams

Bad: No GAJ, but I think it will be ok  8). Rohan but he was on the bench anyway. Daisy, but expected scores round here to start

Ugly: Of the 4 fantasy teams I made, this is the only one without Langdon  >:(

11/1239 is about avg in a high scoring round

enzedder

GAJ would be the Good.
Lobbe would be the Bad.
Buddy would be the Ugly.

ronl

Good:  Simpson, Swallow, Langdon, Ablett, Pendles, Beams, Polec, Hampson, Sandi, Martin

Moderate:  Pav, McVeigh (Both sure to improve)

Poor:  Thomas, Rohan (Both in alot of teams)  and Thomas sure to improve or he doesn't live to see round 3.

12 - 1500


Ricochet

Bad for me were Daisy, Rohan and Buddy but I would expect a lot better from these three in round 2

Vinny

It goes like this from me, I'm reasonably happy so far. 1204/10, Captain has played.

Good:
Ablett, Pendles, Beams, Polec, Simpson, Langdon, Dusty, Sandilands.
Bad:
Daisy.
Ugly
Rohan.


Fid


FactHunt

Great: Swallow- especially at his price
Good: GAJ (C), Pendles, Murph, Beams, Polec, Sandi, Langdon (bench)
Average: Dusty
Bad: McVeigh, Pav, Rohan
Ugly: none

batt

1352/12 (C)

Good: All the staples- Swallow, Pendles, Beams, Polec, Sandi, Dusty
Bad: Daisy
Ugly: Charlie :( (I know he has it in him)

Slammer

GOOD - Ablett, Swallow, Sandi, Murphy, Polec, Beams, Laidler ?, still having $240K leftover

BAD - Rohan, Donough, Langdon on Bench, removing Wingard at last minute, 

UGLY - Jack Martin

1322/12 (C)

Bully

Quote from: ronl on March 17, 2014, 03:09:22 PM
Good:  Simpson, Swallow, Langdon, Ablett, Pendles, Beams, Polec, Hampson, Sandi, Martin

Moderate:  Pav, McVeigh (Both sure to improve)

Poor:  Thomas, Rohan (Both in alot of teams)  and Thomas sure to improve or he doesn't live to see round 3.

12 - 1500

Are you sure that score is correct?

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Bully on March 17, 2014, 10:36:10 PM
Quote from: ronl on March 17, 2014, 03:09:22 PM
Good:  Simpson, Swallow, Langdon, Ablett, Pendles, Beams, Polec, Hampson, Sandi, Martin

Moderate:  Pav, McVeigh (Both sure to improve)

Poor:  Thomas, Rohan (Both in alot of teams)  and Thomas sure to improve or he doesn't live to see round 3.

12 - 1500

Are you sure that score is correct?

LOL, 14 players mentioned, but only 12 in score?

Baggers2012

Good:
Ablett 140
Beams 136
Sandilands 127
Murphy 122
Gray 109
Polec 107
Simpson 105
Laidler 95
Moderate
Martin 102
Parker 95
JPK 91
Pavlich 80
Ugly
Rohan 47
Langdon 111 (on the bench)