The Good, The Bad and The Ugly - Week 1/Round 1

[Keeper27]

So, what were the good, bad & ugly in your team.
Praise, Vent, Scream, Abuse... i know you wanna

I'll start, 7 played so far for 895

Good - GAJ, Beams, Sandi, Swallow, & Polec

Bad - Walters 65 & Broadbent 45*

Ugly - None so far, happy with that.

*Broadbent started as Sub, and came on in the last qtr and scored 45.

[RaisyDaisy]

Pretty happy with how things went for me

Didn't pick Daisy, Clurey, McDonaugh or Rohan

Was tossing up between Hampson and Hickey and went Hickey, but time will tell if that comes back to me burn me

Lowest scoring player for the weekend was Pav with 80, so overall I am happy with my structure and the players I picked and didn't pick

I guess missing Laidler wasn't great, but I actually don't mind because I just couldn't fit him in my team anyway

Good - Everyone :)

No Bad

No Ugly

:)

[Jackross10]

Good: Gaz Gray Martin Polec Simpson Pendles Beams Sandi
Bad: JPK Swan
Ugly: Clurey and Rohan

1251/11

[vmac66]

Good . . Gaz , pendles , beams , Langdon , Simpson , Mitchell , sandi , polec
Ok . . Mcveigh ,
Average . . Rohan , but most will have him .
9/1159
Not having swallow , no ok . But early have Hurn instead

[cortez]

Good: Simpson, Ablett, Prndlebury, Murphy, Beams, Polec, Sandi, Dusty

Bad: Kreuzer, Franklin (Langdon & Laidler both on bench)

Ugly: none :)

[NoButYeah]

So far 1100 from 8.

Good: Gaz, Beams, Swallow, Sandi, Fyfe, Polec, Wingard.
Bad: I guess Tom Mitchell because he's my lowest score so far with 93 and had Langdon on bench as emg.
Ugly: None yet. I just hope I haven't peaked too early

[HotTiges]

9/1190

GOOD - Gaz (c) Beams,Pendles,Polec,Simpson,Sandi,Martin,Parker,Langdon

BAD - Missing Swallow, Rohan and Cluery as subs (slow cash cows)

UGLY - waiting for next part of RD1!

[Keeper27]

BAD - Rohan and Cluery as subs (slow cash cows)

how is it a bad thing if they aren't on the field?? LOL

[HotTiges]

BAD - Rohan and Cluery as subs (slow cash cows)

how is it a bad thing if they aren't on the field?? LOL

Good point haha had to find something? Nah potentially slow cash cows and potentially rookie trade correction needed

[felsty]

Good: GAJ, Beams, Sandilands (VC), Pendles, Polec, Martin, Simpson
Bad: JPK but I'm not too fussed. Wasn't the Swans day in a tight last quarter
Ugly: somehow made a team that went over the 10mil salary cap and saved it when putting Laidler in my team, which then wouldn't let me do any trades when I wanted Impey in over JKH. Had to downgrade Thurlow > King for it to work which I'm not too unhappy about either
1345/11

[hawkers65]

Good:
Simpson- 105
Ablett- 140x2
Penldebury- 127
Beams- 136
Sandilands- 127
Polec- 107
Martin- 102
Laidler- 95

Bad:
Rohan- 47

The Ugly:
None

Virtually read out my whole team who have played, only didn't mention McVeigh and Mitchell as they were just average wit 82 and 93. Overally really happy with how i sit, should see a good round 1 score and dont see any corrective trades needed on the horizon.

[shaker]

GOOD - Swallow , Gaz C , Pendles , Beams , Polec , Sandi , Dusty , Gray

Bad     - Daisy , Lobbe 76 not bad but not good either ( could have been worse terrible first half )

Ugly    - Clurey on field Langdon on bench double ouch !!

Mcveigh and Pav with a couple of 80's was going ok till the Port - Blues game now back in the pack   13/ 1454

[redfield]

Ugly. Charlie Dixon. That is all.

[love4thegame]

Good

Langdon
Ablett(c)
Pendles
Beams
Polec
Sandi
Martin

Bad
Mcveigh
Lobbe

Ugly
Rohan
Franklin

[monga77]

Good- swallow, Langdon, gaz, pendles, beams, cotch, sandi, polec, Martin
Bad- buddy and rohan
1430/12
Lucky so far with rookies I have fielded hopefully it can continue :)