Rohan and Laider stinking it up!

[cortez]

Happy Rohan is my F7, can stay there till he makes enough to get rid of but I'm not buddy happy at all!

[RaisyDaisy]

Anyone who has Rohan, he is the perfect F7 due to his JS, but no way should he be your F6. His extremely overrated and has no history to suggest he will be a good scorer, but his there for you just in case you get a late out

[hawkers65]

Anyone who has Rohan, he is the perfect F7 due to his JS, but no way should he be your F6. His extremely overrated and has no history to suggest he will be a good scorer, but his there for you just in case you get a late out

Only fielded him because was unsure on whether Impey/Harris would play or not be sub, was just being safe, none will be good scorers but Impey/Harris will average comfortably more than Rohan if not sub.

[RaisyDaisy]

Only fielded him because was unsure on whether Impey/Harris would play or not be sub, was just being safe, none will be good scorers but Impey/Harris will average comfortably more than Rohan if not sub.

And that's fine, makes sense

It's only rd1, so it makes sense to field Rohan over the unknown JKH and Impey this week

Moving forward tho I would plan to get him off field

[ben_020285]

Anyone who has Rohan, he is the perfect F7 due to his JS, but no way should he be your F6. His extremely overrated and has no history to suggest he will be a good scorer, but his there for you just in case you get a late out

This is spot on. Asked the question on the previous page but without answer so I'll ask again. I have Rohan on field this week but am bringing in Zorko so Rohan becomes F7 from now on. Should I bench Zorko v Hawks, Caddy v Crows or Higgins v West Coast?

[Ricochet]

Anyone who has Rohan, he is the perfect F7 due to his JS, but no way should he be your F6. His extremely overrated and has no history to suggest he will be a good scorer, but his there for you just in case you get a late out

Completely disagree. He is the perfect F6 because of his JS. Too harsh to be basing this on one game when it was wet and even a star like Buddy can only manage 7 more points than him. Fielding him allows your to have one less rookie down back where these rookies have riskier JS

[RaisyDaisy]

This is spot on. Asked the question on the previous page but without answer so I'll ask again. I have Rohan on field this week but am bringing in Zorko so Rohan becomes F7 from now on. Should I bench Zorko v Hawks, Caddy v Crows or Higgins v West Coast?

Genuine coin toss here

I would field Caddy vs Crows, so for me it's Higgins or Zorko to the pine

Your picking Zorko as a premium fwd, so I guess that sends Higgins to the pine

[Ricochet]

This is spot on. Asked the question on the previous page but without answer so I'll ask again. I have Rohan on field this week but am bringing in Zorko so Rohan becomes F7 from now on. Should I bench Zorko v Hawks, Caddy v Crows or Higgins v West Coast?

Genuine coin toss here

I would field Caddy vs Crows, so for me it's Higgins or Zorko to the pine

Your picking Zorko as a premium fwd, so I guess that sends Higgins to the pine

Agree with RD on Caddy. As for Zorko v Higgins just wait to see if Bob Murphy gets up for round 1. If he doesn't then hopefully Higgins stays at that HB rebounding role. Zorko against the Hawks just puts me off him a little

[RaisyDaisy]

Completely disagree. He is the perfect F6 because of his JS. Too harsh to be basing this on one game when it was wet and even a star like Buddy can only manage 7 more points than him. Fielding him allows your to have one less rookie down back where these rookies have riskier JS

Valid point, but at the end of the day it comes down to your team structure

I believe that the def and fwd lines should be pretty stacked this year because there are plenty of mid rookies and cheap rucks to go with who all have better JS and scoring potential then the fwd and def rookies, so that's why I have Higgins at F6 and Rohan isn't even in my team

There is no right or wrong answer, and of course we will all have different opinions. Each to their own

[enzedder]

Honestly believe Rohan isn't a good SC pick. I know he has had injury problems and been used as a sub in the past that accounts for much of his poor scoring in seasons past. He has a great amount of talent and think that while he can have an impact on games, he can also go quiet for long periods. I understand why people have picked him (price, JS & lack of options) but think low scoring, such as this week- albeit in poor conditions might be commonplace. Only R1 to go by and so far so good in that I didn't go that way...my eggs are in the Higgins basket and no guarantee that'll be any better than Rohan's 47. Will take some time to see who the happy punters are.

[Vinny]

I do not rate him and think he is a spud to be completely honest, haha.

But I thought that GWS would get smashed by like 50+ and all the Swans' players would have their scores inflated.

I was wrong.. :(

[enzedder]

I do not rate him and think he is a spud to be completely honest, haha.

But I thought that GWS would get smashed by like 50+ and all the Swans' players would have their scores inflated.

I was wrong.. :(

Runs a bit faster than a spud. Maybe he's a bean. A runner bean.

[Vinny]

Hahaha yeah true.

[Doggoneit]

As for Zorko v Higgins just wait to see if Bob Murphy gets up for round 1. If he doesn't then hopefully Higgins stays at that HB rebounding role. Zorko against the Hawks just puts me off him a little

I believe Higgins will stay down back all year. Murphy will play high half forward role. Macca wanted Murph fwd last year but was forced to play him back more than he wanted. The theory being Murph's elite kicking being able to hit fwd 50 targets.

[Torpedo10]

Anyone not have Higgins?  :P