Higgins vs Wright

[lachie_001]

Which one? I feel like maybe wright it a little less risky.

[Mr.Craig]

Depends how you define risky. Wright has one season averaging above 70, Higgins has five.

[henry]

Depends how you define risky. Wright has one season averaging above 70, Higgins has five.

Yes, but Wright has only really had one season where he has had injury issues, Higgins a lot more. I've gone for Wright personally, due to the crows injuries he should get a decent amount of mid time. Is also valued higher so if he gets injured or something you don't need as much cash to get a decent replacement.

[Ziplock]

Depends how you define risky. Wright has one season averaging above 70, Higgins has five.

Yes, but Wright has only really had one season where he has had injury issues, Higgins a lot more. I've gone for Wright personally, due to the crows injuries he should get a decent amount of mid time. Is also valued higher so if he gets injured or something you don't need as much cash to get a decent replacement.

those weren't injuries, it was a role change.

I have both ;)

[St.FatBoy]

Higgins already a burn man and Wright on track for same.  Surely never again?  Unless one fires in the first 2 rounds... http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/Smileys/default/tongue.gif

[Ricochet]

I'd grab Higgins mate. Wright has potential but the risk of tagging duties is too high imo

[SydneyRox]

I cant have both, would not be good for my heart.

I have gone against the heart and gone with my head and picked Missy