Round 1 Progressive Scores

[LaHug]

390/3 with Pendles, Beams, and Sandi ;D

[twinkle]

503/4 - Pendles, Beams, Sandi, Langdon

[Sabretooth Tigers]

 ::)
374 / 3      with Beams, Sandy and Langdon.

[bartyboys]

what percentage do we think will have beams pendles, sandi, Langdon on field

[LaHug]

what percentage do we think will have beams pendles, sandi, Langdon on field

I'd say vast majority have Beams, Pendles, and Sandi. Significantly fewer with Langdon on the field though.

[Bigjim]

what percentage do we think will have beams pendles, sandi, Langdon on field

90% of the realistic contenders should have at least 3. Langdon as an emergency and sandi and beams on field at the very least.

[Typhnn]

3/386 - Pendle, Sandi, Barlow

still don't know how Collingwood players scores so highly when they got absolutely pumped tonight...!!

[AaronKirk]

600/5- Beams, Fyfe, Sandi, Johnson, Langdon

[connor]

100% should have sandi and most should have beams and/or pendles
but not as many people would have langdon at all let alone on the field(i had him on bench with no E)

[Keeper27]

328/3
Beams, Sandi, Walters.

not worried about Walters score, He'll get better.

[BoredSaint]

623/5 good start :)
Beams, Pendles, Fyfe, Langdon, Sandi

[eagles929406]

390/3 with langdon as emergency considering picking a non playing rookie for rnd 1 just to get the 111   ???

[Bones Bombers]

Not sure yet?
Either 390/3 Beams, Pendles, Sandi.
Or 517/3 with Sandi's VC score.
Or 628/4 with Langdon's E score as well.
Or 501/4 with Langdon's E score but not Sandi's VC score.
I dunno!

[auscoyote]

455/4 Pendles, Beams, Sandi, Walters.

[Vinny]

501/4

Langdon, Beams, Sandilands, Pendlebury.