Round 1 Progressive Scores

Started by Mr.Craig, March 14, 2014, 10:24:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jalapeno

Quote from: Aaron26 on March 18, 2014, 12:44:29 PM
Quote from: Jalapeno on March 18, 2014, 11:48:00 AM
1380/13 C played

Still to come:
Stanton 120
Watson 120
Redden 110
Shiels 100
Mitchell 105
Birchall 90
Suckling 90
McEvoy 90
Wright 90
Higgins 90

If all goes to plan 2385 :)
hahahahahahahaha bit optimistic mate!

Have to be optimistic... Otherwise i wouldnt have picked these players in the first place.

TBH i have undercut some players like Mitchell who will very likely go 110+ against a team he dominates. Also stants will probably go 130+ since he fires hard early and had a 153 last year in round 1 against the same opposition. So IMO i could actually score better if everyone does there job

Ricochet

I actually didn't think they were that bad

LaHug

Only ones I really disagree with are Birchall, Suckling, Wright, and Higgins. Maybe Shiels a little bit too.

Jalapeno

Quote from: LaHug on March 18, 2014, 06:45:38 PM
Only ones I really disagree with are Birchall, Suckling, Wright, and Higgins. Maybe Shiels a little bit too.

Yeah I dont think they will be far off what i wrote though.
Birch has proven he can easily score 90 along with suckers.
Higgins.... well i admit maybe i got a tad excited here but should push towards it. Shiels IMO will def crack a ton this week and could go 110-120

RookieDTer

Not too far away from me
1435/13
Stanton 120
Cox 97
Zorko 80
Caddy 90
Ellis 75
Suckling 85
Mitchell 100
McDonald 70
Dangerfield 100
=817 from 9
=2,252.

Call it 2,250...

Quote from: Jalapeno on March 18, 2014, 06:40:43 PM
Quote from: Aaron26 on March 18, 2014, 12:44:29 PM
Quote from: Jalapeno on March 18, 2014, 11:48:00 AM
1380/13 C played

Still to come:
Stanton 120
Watson 120
Redden 110
Shiels 100
Mitchell 105
Birchall 90
Suckling 90
McEvoy 90
Wright 90
Higgins 90

If all goes to plan 2385 :)
hahahahahahahaha bit optimistic mate!

Have to be optimistic... Otherwise i wouldnt have picked these players in the first place.

TBH i have undercut some players like Mitchell who will very likely go 110+ against a team he dominates. Also stants will probably go 130+ since he fires hard early and had a 153 last year in round 1 against the same opposition. So IMO i could actually score better if everyone does there job

Scrads

1273, 9 players remaining. At the moment they are Mitchell, Grimes, Suckling, Watson, Masten, Libba, Tyson, Gunston, Higgins.

Mr.Craig

981/10.

I can almost hear Nelson Muntz going "Ha ha" when I look at my team.

DT Gun

1500 from 13 with Gazza Captain

Mitchell
Suckling
Langford
McDonald
Tyson
Ellis
Cox
Riewoldt
Higgins

Hope she holds together but not confident in McDonald :(

Jalapeno

#128
1759/16 C Played
Still to come:
Mitchell
Suckling
Stanton
Redden
Higgins
Hickey


HBTD22

1976 from 18 with Higgins, Mitchell, Hodge and Grimes to come. Enright, Caddy and Jacobs all killed it tonight for me, thinking Jacobs has probably played his way in permanently after tonight!

LaHug

1414/14 + C
S-t-ruggling in all forms of fantasy this week.

auscoyote


stew42

1201/10 with Captain Gaz in. Didn't mind the Jelwood inclusion either  ;)
Still to come:
Sitchell (100)
Hanley (90)
Suckling (80)
McDonald (70)
Watson (110)
Macrae (90)
Tyson (85)
McEvoy (85)
Riewoldt (95)
Roughead (90)
Higgins (80)
Hunter (70)
Should be around 2250 :D

nostradamus

1600/15 ...... Cothchin Capt

At the moment l have Mitchell, Birchall, Suckling, Stanton, Hickey, LeCras and Chappy to come

jvalles69

#134
1183 - 11 played Ablett Captain

Still to come:
Mitchell - 105 - 68
Suckling - 80 - 85
Watson - 105 153
Shiels - 95 109
Masten - 105 67
Tyson - 80 106
Cox - 110 108
Gunston -85 92
Higgins - 90 78
Darling - 85 96
Roughhead - 95 98

Woops...2218 :)