Tom Langdon

[billnats]

Matt Crouch gonna play regular footy? Thinking about spending Hanley money on bringing in Watson into a 5 man premium midfield and starting Langdon.

Either that or bring in Roughy/Parker up forward.

[hawkers65]

Article on K.K:

http://www.themercury.com.au/sport/afl/tassie-sun-kade-kolodjashnij-in-the-spotlight/story-fnj4f7h7-1226853038625

'Kolodjashnij is under consideration for Gold Coast's season opener against Richmond at Metricon on Saturday night.'

'The only thing stopping him could be a tight hamstring that kept him out of the Suns' two NAB Challenge games.'

If i was to pick a non scoring guy, this would be him.

[Holz]

Last minute took him off the field and is now emergency. Will not go after his score.

My suggestion if you do want it though, pick Hubbard if he doesn't play.

If Hibberd misses just 1 I may well do that, had him in my side until he got injured

Is it worth it? Because i assume Mitchell/Simpson is locked in every team and the other D i'd dropped would be McVeigh... McVeigh could easily score that so you might end up loosing points. It needs to be a rookie if you were to do it. K.K looks alright but is a bit expensive.

I really don't think so, a unsubbed rookie I expect to go about 70.  Don't stuff your setup or a trade for 40 points, that's nothing over a season

The only thing to take from this is I went 2 starting back rookies, this strategy looks validated at this early stage, so downgrade to this back setup might be a goof move. But don't try and get his score on the field.

Saying that it could be a one off, its game 1 of the season it's a marathon not a Sprint. Also if you have a 125+ VC score take it.

[hawkers65]

Last minute took him off the field and is now emergency. Will not go after his score.

My suggestion if you do want it though, pick Hubbard if he doesn't play.

If Hibberd misses just 1 I may well do that, had him in my side until he got injured

Is it worth it? Because i assume Mitchell/Simpson is locked in every team and the other D i'd dropped would be McVeigh... McVeigh could easily score that so you might end up loosing points. It needs to be a rookie if you were to do it. K.K looks alright but is a bit expensive.

I really don't think so, a unsubbed rookie I expect to go about 70.  Don't stuff your setup or a trade for 40 points, that's nothing over a season

The only thing to take from this is I went 2 starting back rookies, this strategy looks validated at this early stage, so downgrade to this back setup might be a goof move. But don't try and get his score on the field.

Saying that it could be a one off, its game 1 of the season it's a marathon not a Sprint. Also if you have a 125+ VC score take it.

I have Sandi... Unsure i would take that over Ablett, i told myself 135 before the game.

[CrowsFan]

I have him E in mids. Trying to find out a way to get it.

Could always trade one of your prems to Montagna since he is suspended round 1, but will still be a gun this year.

[billnats]

Article on K.K:

http://www.themercury.com.au/sport/afl/tassie-sun-kade-kolodjashnij-in-the-spotlight/story-fnj4f7h7-1226853038625

'Kolodjashnij is under consideration for Gold Coast's season opener against Richmond at Metricon on Saturday night.'

'The only thing stopping him could be a tight hamstring that kept him out of the Suns' two NAB Challenge games.'

If i was to pick a non scoring guy, this would be him.

Using him for the loophole... should be back in a couple weeks time for their next game

[Fid]

Had Langdon as E, traded out Webster for KK

[frogjumper]

Have Langdon as E and Sandi as VC

If definitely a interesting question. Considering Laidler to KK to use both the VC and E loophole in 1.
I see KK as having better job security over the season than Laidler. But I can also burn a trade to make a correction trade for round 2 if he isn't named going forward.

I originally planned on a maximum of 3 corrections trades before the start of the leagues. Happy with the rest of my team and that I might need 1 in the midfield or 1 in the forwards if something isn't working.

[SydneyRox]

its only one game... what you going to do if you move on laidler and he rips up a 90?

be happy that you have langdon in your team and his JS just shot right up

[Spite]

its only one game... what you going to do if you move on laidler and he rips up a 90?

be happy that you have langdon in your team and his JS just shot right up

+1 sensible comment

[frogjumper]

Yep that's the question. It is tempting to do, but at what risk.
Don't forget players prices go up after R1 aswell this year so you will be losing cash generation for doing it too.

Don't think ill be doing it to be honest.

[Spite]

Yep that's the question. It is tempting to do, but at what risk.
Don't forget players prices go up after R1 aswell this year so you will be losing cash generation for doing it too.

Don't think ill be doing it to be honest.

Hang on, isn't it after Round 2? :O

[frogjumper]

Yep that's the question. It is tempting to do, but at what risk.
Don't forget players prices go up after R1 aswell this year so you will be losing cash generation for doing it too.

Don't think ill be doing it to be honest.

Hang on, isn't it after Round 2? :O

Just checked website and it still says 3 game average, must have played 3 games to increase or decrease.
Don't know what to think now.

[Marcos83]

So glad I didn't make the same mistake.  Feel sorry for the others. I guess its only 1 match which shouldnt kill your season

[GM]

Yep that's the question. It is tempting to do, but at what risk.
Don't forget players prices go up after R1 aswell this year so you will be losing cash generation for doing it too.

Don't think ill be doing it to be honest.

Hang on, isn't it after Round 2? :O

Just checked website and it still says 3 game average, must have played 3 games to increase or decrease.
Don't know what to think now.

In AF price increases after rd 2