Langford vs Cameron

Started by shorty3264, March 13, 2014, 04:36:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Vinny

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 13, 2014, 06:25:50 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 13, 2014, 06:19:42 PM
I reckon Michie, Tyson, Polec, Ellis, Dunstan should all be picked before him. Just for JS reasons

what if you got 6 mid rookies though like me?
Yeah same, was wondering that, haha.

T Dog

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 13, 2014, 06:25:50 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 13, 2014, 06:19:42 PM
I reckon Michie, Tyson, Polec, Ellis, Dunstan should all be picked before him. Just for JS reasons

what if you got 6 mid rookies though like me?

6 rookies like you KB?...may just need a bit of work...prefer to have 6 like Tyson..imo.. ;D

tigertops

Langford as a tagger in the middle.  Hawks have Sewell and rioli to come back both play mid or can rotate thru. Who r they gonna drop for these two. Langford gotta be no 1 candidate.
Just saying at least two have to go from hawks rd 1 side

ubeaut

Quote from: tigertops on March 13, 2014, 08:04:11 PM
Langford as a tagger in the middle.  Hawks have Sewell and rioli to come back both play mid or can rotate thru. Who r they gonna drop for these two. Langford gotta be no 1 candidate.
Just saying at least two have to go from hawks rd 1 side
And Stratton and Lake. KPPs I know but they're best 21

mancityfc

if you have suckling and mitchell which predominantly most people do going with cameron would be a better pick. Too many hawkerssss

ubeaut

#20
Quote from: mancityfc on March 13, 2014, 08:14:47 PM
if you have suckling and mitchell which predominantly most people do going with cameron would be a better pick. Too many hawkerssss
Doesn't matter about rookies so much. U can upgrade.

I'm just worried about JS - So Cameron or Langford??? And what about Langdon? I'm still unsure who has best JS. Maybe going someone more expensive like Laidler is the go - then u have cash to easily fix rookies if necessary?

Ricochet

Quote from: ubeaut on March 13, 2014, 08:09:19 PM
Quote from: tigertops on March 13, 2014, 08:04:11 PM
Langford as a tagger in the middle.  Hawks have Sewell and rioli to come back both play mid or can rotate thru. Who r they gonna drop for these two. Langford gotta be no 1 candidate.
Just saying at least two have to go from hawks rd 1 side
And Stratton and Lake. KPPs I know but they're best 21
Guerra, Savage, Buddy, Sewell, Stratton, Lake, Rioli. Quite a few holes to fill. I think he'll be fine for at least the first 4-5 rounds

kilbluff1985

some of you guys are crazy

maygs

Quote from: roti on March 13, 2014, 05:00:24 PM
Think Langford has much better JS really, has earnt his spot in Hawthorn's team, Cameron is there because Thompson and Tape are out, he could get dropped for Thompson in round 2

Langford may lose his spot as soon as Lake is available to play.  This is the thought that keeps me awake at night.

kilbluff1985

Quote from: maygs on March 14, 2014, 08:19:25 AM
Quote from: roti on March 13, 2014, 05:00:24 PM
Think Langford has much better JS really, has earnt his spot in Hawthorn's team, Cameron is there because Thompson and Tape are out, he could get dropped for Thompson in round 2

Langford may lose his spot as soon as Lake is available to play.  This is the thought that keeps me awake at night.

I'm more worried about the 7 spiders we supposedly swallow during our sleeping per year

bonebones

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 14, 2014, 08:21:32 AM
Quote from: maygs on March 14, 2014, 08:19:25 AM
Quote from: roti on March 13, 2014, 05:00:24 PM


I'm more worried about the 7 spiders we supposedly swallow during our sleeping per year

It's per lifetime. Get some sleep killbluff.

Neither Langford or cameron for me. I prefer Clurey, Laidler, Langdon