Combo time (D5) VS (R1)

Started by blues123, March 12, 2014, 09:51:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

blues123

both are good combos but IMO suckling hasn't really proven he is worth it, webster did show he is wort 240k.
What do you guys think which combo i get

GoLions

lol I think Suckling proved in the last 2 years prior to his injury that he's worth it, however I'm not sure that I would want Lobbe. If you could find an extra 50k or so from somewhere else in order to change Lobbe into Leuey or NicNat that would be preferable

blues123

Quote from: GoLions16 on March 12, 2014, 09:59:18 PM
lol I think Suckling proved in the last 2 years prior to his injury that he's worth it, however I'm not sure that I would want Lobbe. If you could find an extra 50k or so from somewhere else in order to change Lobbe into Leuey or NicNat that would be preferable
D:  Mitchell Hurn Suckling Swallow McDonald (Georgiu Clurey)
M: Ablett Pendles Watson Beams Murphy Polec Ellis Michie (Dunstan Crouch)
R: Lobbe Sandilands (Dericxx King)
F: Dangerfield Martin Parker Caddy  Hggins Rohan (JHK impey)
cash: 7k where do u think i can find my extra 50 k

GoLions

You're missing a defender there^

Any one (or more) of Parker to Pav/Gunston, Watson to Libba/Rocky/Cotchin, Murphy to Daisy/Macrae. Could even get Goldy or Minson if you did the Murphy trade

blues123

my spare def is simmo and i like all those players i wait till lobbe gains cash and nic nat lowers in cash then upgrade lobbe to nic nat

Marcos83

Maybe Rohan who is 170 k. Only problem isnot many options there.

blues123

I went with the second option looking at st. kilda's draw webster could make a fair bit of cash

auscoyote

Quote from: blues123 on March 12, 2014, 10:22:11 PM
I went with the second option looking at st. kilda's draw webster could make a fair bit of cash
Yep thats the call that i would iv'e gone with. Webster to take Dals role and Nic Nat even though risky with fitness has way more upside than lobbe.