The Jimmy Webster or Matt Suckling debate

[GCSkiwi]

If people are taking Higgins then there's not much argument against Webster at the same price?

Have Suckling Webster McD at D4-6 ATM. Backline is still somewhere to save $$$ as it's the lowest scoring line. As long as 2 of McVeigh,Mitchell,Walker,anyone else who u think will be top 6 are there.

higgins and webster are completely different.

always take the player you know who can score but the risk is injury over the player who your not sure if they can score or not.

Webster has shown nothing yet. Even when webster stopped getting the vest he only went 44 50 59 74 35 so a 52.5 average at 240k thats a big no way. Had a good NAB but what happens when stkilda are getting destroyed week in week out.

Suckling for only an extra 70k has gone 91, 83. Not sure why this is even a question. Plays for the best SC team in the comp and the Hawks will share plenty of points.

[/thread]

[batt]

I think the real question is if the risk is worth $70k