Tom Hickey

[seeds40]

Cox doesn't exactly have an easy task, Minson is a quality ruckman. I wouldn't be suprised if Cox pulls out an 85

And you can be sure any other ruckman will pull out better?  I actually think Jacobs will pull out a big score against Geelong.  Cox is far more mobile than Minson and will get all his points on +6 marks and kicks all day long.

No i'm not sure any other ruckman can pull out better, but someone like Jacobs as you suggested or McEvoy are over $100,000 cheaper for potentially the same score or something like 10 points less than what Cox would get in my opinion

[jvalles69]

Cox doesn't exactly have an easy task, Minson is a quality ruckman. I wouldn't be suprised if Cox pulls out an 85

And you can be sure any other ruckman will pull out better?  I actually think Jacobs will pull out a big score against Geelong.  Cox is far more mobile than Minson and will get all his points on +6 marks and kicks all day long.

No i'm not sure any other ruckman can pull out better, but someone like Jacobs as you suggested or McEvoy are over $100,000 cheaper for potentially the same score or something like 10 points less than what Cox would get in my opinion

But thats assuming Cox will only score 85...first game of the season, possibly no NicNat, Cox will run amok on the Doggies, that's my opinion anyway and I'm sticking to it!  ;)

[seeds40]

Cox doesn't exactly have an easy task, Minson is a quality ruckman. I wouldn't be suprised if Cox pulls out an 85

And you can be sure any other ruckman will pull out better?  I actually think Jacobs will pull out a big score against Geelong.  Cox is far more mobile than Minson and will get all his points on +6 marks and kicks all day long.

I definately agree with Cox being a good pick, but for me the price is just to much

No i'm not sure any other ruckman can pull out better, but someone like Jacobs as you suggested or McEvoy are over $100,000 cheaper for potentially the same score or something like 10 points less than what Cox would get in my opinion

But thats assuming Cox will only score 85...first game of the season, possibly no NicNat, Cox will run amok on the Doggies, that's my opinion anyway and I'm sticking to it!  ;)

[me]

Cox doesn't exactly have an easy task, Minson is a quality ruckman. I wouldn't be suprised if Cox pulls out an 85

And you can be sure any other ruckman will pull out better?  I actually think Jacobs will pull out a big score against Geelong.  Cox is far more mobile than Minson and will get all his points on +6 marks and kicks all day long.

I definately agree with Cox being a good pick, but for me the price is just to much

No i'm not sure any other ruckman can pull out better, but someone like Jacobs as you suggested or McEvoy are over $100,000 cheaper for potentially the same score or something like 10 points less than what Cox would get in my opinion

But thats assuming Cox will only score 85...first game of the season, possibly no NicNat, Cox will run amok on the Doggies, that's my opinion anyway and I'm sticking to it!  ;)

yep

minson is good, but as ppl have said cox doesn't exactly rely on hitouts to score big... look at his past history on the dogs, and also round 1, and also without nicnat/underdone nicnat...

i would be gobsmacked if he went under 100 tbh

sauce jacobs could go alright but he's so flowering dopey and doesn't do shower around the ground ... but cox is pretty much a certainty ... probably jinxed him now ... in fact jump off ... ppl in my team are usually cursed

[n4cr123]

Very risky can see him sharing the ruck load a fair bit.

[Barra17]

I am going him, but another thing to note with Cox is that Nic Nat is going to be lining up for round 1.

[GM]

I am going him, but another thing to note with Cox is that Nic Nat is going to be lining up for round 1.

Hasnt stopped him pumping out big numbers over the last 3 years with the Nic Nat combo.

[jvalles69]

I am going him, but another thing to note with Cox is that Nic Nat is going to be lining up for round 1.

Hasnt stopped him pumping out big numbers over the last 3 years with the Nic Nat combo.

And most ruckmen play with a backup who can "steal" their points.  Not enough reason to NOT have Cox.

[Barra17]

I'm not saying don't pick Cox at all, just saying it was worth something to note. ;)

[me]

gotta say, i am considering this guy, although i think cox will score best round 1 considerably, he just frees up so much cash ... can get an extra premo mid when this guy is in my team

[DT Gun]

Cox v Bulldogs

2013 - 112 & 102
2012 - 107
2011 - 125 & 155

Last 5 at an average of - 120

If you even consider Hickey slap yourself in the face

[nas]

Cox into Sandi Lands you in the Thurlow weed after eating Currie