swallow v suckling + 100k

[ThePreditorPenguin]

I want to have both players but with my current lineup it doesn't allow it.
I was without Suckling but it seems so dumb to not have him. But at the same time I think swallow will do well, but probably still not make a top 10-15 highest def.
The 100k would just be sitting in the bank, not usefully anywhere else as I am quite happy with my team.
So my straight forward question is Swallow or Suckling?

[whynot102]

Swallow as Suckling just coming back from a major injury had Suckling a couple of years ago and he can spud it up

[sniper]

I'd take the 100k. It'll be the difference in being able to pluck a premo out of the air instead of waiting an extra round or two.

[RaisyDaisy]

Suckling

IMO Swallow needs to average more than 20ppg to justify the extra 100k in him, and I highly doubt he will average that much more than Suckers

[Doggoneit]

I'd take the 100k. It'll be the difference in being able to pluck a premo out of the air instead of waiting an extra round or two.

Suckling

IMO Swallow needs to average more than 20ppg to justify the extra 100k in him, and I highly doubt he will average that much more than Suckers

+1 and +1,  Suckers seems much better value

[ThePreditorPenguin]

thanks for all your advice guys, currently have suckling as i agree that swallow would need to average quite a lot higher to be worth the 100k

[HotTiges]

Suckling.. will avg close if not more then Swallow IMO. Swallow will be a star.. just not 100% sure it's this year although brother Andrew broke out in his 4th year..