Gunston and Roughy

Started by dbfc, March 09, 2014, 11:18:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

dbfc

Could you have gunston and roughead in the samw forward line
Current forward line
Danger martin roughy gunston higgins rohan

Keep it or downgrade one to caddy and use cash elsewhere?

hawkers65

Quote from: dbfc on March 09, 2014, 11:18:55 AM
Could you have gunston and roughead in the samw forward line
Current forward line
Danger martin roughy gunston higgins rohan

Keep it or downgrade one to caddy and use cash elsewhere?

Dont like having two KPP players from the same team. Yeah it would be good if they bullied a shower team, but its unlikely both will do well on a regular day, and if its wet or the Hawks just have a poor game, then it will end badly. IMO i like the idea of going Gunston to Caddy and using the cash elsewhere. Leave Roughy, he is a beast! :P

Blues Blues Blues

Thinking the same.

I had Dusty and Pav, but now I'm contemplating Roughy and Gunston.

Dusty - can go big, is a midfielder, BUT has the ability to do something stupid, not follow team rules,etc
Pav - cheap and tempting, should score more than his price, BUT he is getting older...
Roughy - a bl#*dy big unit! and should score well with Buddy gone
Gunston - scored over 100 with only 1 goal yesterday so a good sign he was getting a fair bit of the ball and not just relying on goals to get his points

Hawks should win more games than they lose, and even if it is wet the full 3300 points need to be allocated so the hawks should benefit from a bigger skew.

Decisions, decisions - I think I'm going to lock it in...

Jimmykidd

they played bloody melbourne. go ahead and get sucked in.

dbfc

Im not sucked in but will choose one of gunston\roughy

Leaning towards roughead
Proven he can avg 100+

Blues Blues Blues

Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 09, 2014, 12:08:58 PM
they played bloody melbourne. go ahead and get sucked in.

Wow, you're a little aggressive aren't you princess?