Main Menu

Terlich

Started by vmac66, March 03, 2014, 10:45:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

vmac66

What I saw of the demons game the other night , was a side who wants to keep possession  by going backwards  from the mid of the ground ,
I could be wrong . .,
Will this game plan help Terlich average upwards of 90 , and be worth starting at d4 . .?

Purplehaze25

Yes yes yes yes yes! Keep this quite though... ;) great POD!

C.Judd3Votes

Turns it over too much. His SC ave will be similar to hisDT average

vmac66

Tks for the different views , am leaning towards him , but didn't know about his poor disposal

Purplehaze25

Quote from: C.Judd3Votes on March 03, 2014, 03:24:28 PM
Turns it over too much. His SC ave will be similar to hisDT average

Have you watched him play?
He ran at a 93% DE in the last nab match...
doesn't seem to poor to me  ???

C.Judd3Votes

Quote from: Purplehaze25 on March 03, 2014, 04:16:16 PM
Quote from: C.Judd3Votes on March 03, 2014, 03:24:28 PM
Turns it over too much. His SC ave will be similar to hisDT average

Have you watched him play?
He ran at a 93% DE in the last nab match...
doesn't seem to poor to me  ???
2013 he average more in DT than he did in SC

My point stands.

Purplehaze25

Quote from: C.Judd3Votes on March 03, 2014, 04:24:49 PM
Quote from: Purplehaze25 on March 03, 2014, 04:16:16 PM
Quote from: C.Judd3Votes on March 03, 2014, 03:24:28 PM
Turns it over too much. His SC ave will be similar to hisDT average

Have you watched him play?
He ran at a 93% DE in the last nab match...
doesn't seem to poor to me  ???
2013 he average more in DT than he did in SC

My point stands.

Sorry, mate but I don't think so...
93% says enough for me, especially under a new game plan of paul roos

tor01doc

Cheap sideways kick to kick is more valuable in DT than SC.

Winning teams score more because of their players' influence on the game.

Blues Blues Blues

Quote from: tor01doc on March 03, 2014, 06:27:29 PM
Cheap sideways kick to kick is more valuable in DT than SC.

Winning teams score more because of their players' influence on the game.

So would you take him Doc?

HotTiges

He is an interesting pick.Seems pricey but there is no doubt he can score consistently over 80.just get worried when he had a few games for example against Geelong last season he got like 30 and another game he got another very low score.. I'd be wary about starting him in traditional SC but would be a good SC draft pick.

tor01doc

No to Terlich for me.

Prefer Watts, Waters when back, Lake or Vlastuin.

Anthonyyyy

strongly considering as well as Lynden Dunn and Jack Grimes as they have a good bye but don't know who will be the best pick

HotTiges

Quote from: Anthonyyyy on March 03, 2014, 09:38:59 PM
strongly considering as well as Lynden Dunn and Jack Grimes as they have a good bye but don't know who will be the best pick

Dunn is one who interests me. Former Fan Footy Spud turned into potential SC POD.. Can score big and is a lock in DEF in Melbs best 22. make or break pick.

hawkers65

Quote from: HotTiges on March 03, 2014, 09:41:09 PM
Quote from: Anthonyyyy on March 03, 2014, 09:38:59 PM
strongly considering as well as Lynden Dunn and Jack Grimes as they have a good bye but don't know who will be the best pick

Dunn is one who interests me. Former Fan Footy Spud turned into potential SC POD.. Can score big and is a lock in DEF in Melbs best 22. make or break pick.

Have just brought in Dunn for cash and bye reasons, along with adding Pendles/Cuningham in the expense of Hurn/Watson/C.Beams, thoughts?

Dunn currently in 0.4% of teams  :o Could be a pick that gives you that edge. Averaging comfortably over 100 in the NAB and had an extremely SC friendly role under Roo's.. Is having all of Dunn/Cheski and Gray too risky in one team?

quinny88

Melbourne can play however they like during the nab challenge but teams aren't going to let them play kick to kick when the real stuff starts. If that's the path they are going to try and go down then they are in for another very long year.