Dangerfeild + Shuey vs T.Mitchell + Masten

Started by Glort, March 02, 2014, 04:32:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ricochet

Quote from: jvalles69 on March 04, 2014, 01:43:49 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 04, 2014, 01:34:44 PM
Quote from: Glort on March 04, 2014, 10:32:13 AM
Hey Power, do you think T.Mitchell will out score Dangers? I am thinking he might....... not sure if I have the balls to drop Dangerfeild though........
No chance. Not in the near future anyway

Never say never.  Champion data has Swans mids having the best overall run for the year, I would not be surprised at all if Titch has at very least a 3 figure average and wouldn't be shocked if he is higher than a lot of our "locks".
Come round 1 TMitch will play the fwd role we saw at the end of last year which greatly affecting his scoring output. He has been dominating NAB because he has been attending more centre bounces than JPK, ROK, Jack and Hannebery. This won't be the case come round 1.

powersuperkents

Quote from: Ricochet on March 04, 2014, 01:58:17 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 04, 2014, 01:43:49 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 04, 2014, 01:34:44 PM
Quote from: Glort on March 04, 2014, 10:32:13 AM
Hey Power, do you think T.Mitchell will out score Dangers? I am thinking he might....... not sure if I have the balls to drop Dangerfeild though........
No chance. Not in the near future anyway

Never say never.  Champion data has Swans mids having the best overall run for the year, I would not be surprised at all if Titch has at very least a 3 figure average and wouldn't be shocked if he is higher than a lot of our "locks".
Come round 1 TMitch will play the fwd role we saw at the end of last year which greatly affecting his scoring output. He has been dominating NAB because he has been attending more centre bounces than JPK, ROK, Jack and Hannebery. This won't be the case come round 1.
I've got to agree, he'll be in the forward pocket. I think I'll stick with Chad to avoid '2nd year blues'

jvalles69

Quote from: powersuperkents on March 04, 2014, 02:00:14 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 04, 2014, 01:58:17 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 04, 2014, 01:43:49 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 04, 2014, 01:34:44 PM
Quote from: Glort on March 04, 2014, 10:32:13 AM
Hey Power, do you think T.Mitchell will out score Dangers? I am thinking he might....... not sure if I have the balls to drop Dangerfeild though........
No chance. Not in the near future anyway

Never say never.  Champion data has Swans mids having the best overall run for the year, I would not be surprised at all if Titch has at very least a 3 figure average and wouldn't be shocked if he is higher than a lot of our "locks".
Come round 1 TMitch will play the fwd role we saw at the end of last year which greatly affecting his scoring output. He has been dominating NAB because he has been attending more centre bounces than JPK, ROK, Jack and Hannebery. This won't be the case come round 1.
I've got to agree, he'll be in the forward pocket. I think I'll stick with Chad to avoid '2nd year blues'

Hmmm...will be interesting to see, but yeah his scores will be up and down if thats the role he is playing.

Money

Quote from: jvalles69 on March 04, 2014, 01:43:49 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 04, 2014, 01:34:44 PM
Quote from: Glort on March 04, 2014, 10:32:13 AM
Hey Power, do you think T.Mitchell will out score Dangers? I am thinking he might....... not sure if I have the balls to drop Dangerfeild though........
No chance. Not in the near future anyway

Never say never.  Champion data has Swans mids having the best overall run for the year, I would not be surprised at all if Titch has at very least a 3 figure average and wouldn't be shocked if he is higher than a lot of our "locks".

Mitchell won't go past 90, Will average 86 IMO

Jroo

Danger is a lock, so I'd go with Danger and Shuey.
Shuey had a down year in 2013, but I feel he can bounce back.

Glort

Danger is a very safe option because everyone will have him......... but isn't anyone worried about him spending too much time foward? Or being tagged out of games? I am leaning towards picking him....... But only because it feels safe :)

Money

Quote from: Glort on March 04, 2014, 04:43:49 PM
Danger is a very safe option because everyone will have him......... but isn't anyone worried about him spending too much time foward? Or being tagged out of games? I am leaning towards picking him....... But only because it feels safe :)

I think it's the exact same with guns like GAJ, Swan, Danger, a team will not keep their best midfielder up forward for too long. Strong case with Dangerfield