Anyone for a cheap Doggy?

Started by colmullet, February 28, 2014, 01:20:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

twinkle

Quote from: Ringo on February 28, 2014, 01:41:52 PM
None of these guys will get tagged as that will go to Boyd or Libba so safe there as well.

No they'll (try) and tag Griffen first. And they wont tag Boyd.

But agree Wallis, Stevens, and Macrae are safe from being tagged (unless they are breaking a game apart).

I'd take Macrae out of the 3, but wouldn't/haven't picked any. Griffen and Libba are the best bets for the doggies in the Mid - both will score elite I reckon. 

upthemaidens

Quote from: colmullet on February 28, 2014, 01:20:16 PM
Thinking about taking on one of these guys along with Daisy in the middle, Doggies have looked pretty good in the NAB (i know its only NAB) and in particular these 3 look like they could significantly up their output this year:

Mitch Wallis: Price (386K) NAB scores (110, 92), Looks like he may still get "tagging" jobs but doesnt look like hes going about it in a Crowley like manner where he concentrates 100% on stopping his opponent, big tackler but also gets his own ball and runs off.

Koby Stevens: Price (367.1K) NAB scores (118, 131), Big NAB from Koby who has always shown he had the talent but hasn't had to much opportunity till last year. Has the potential to really break out i think.

Jackson Macrae: Price (331.1K) NAB scores (106, 123), Another guy with an impressive NAB, last year was his first and unvested averaged ~80, big ask for a 2nd year kid but has shown nothing to suggest he can't live up to it.

Anyone interested?
Gather their ownership numbers would be quite low, if so, then not many would be interested.
      I think you should take a punt on one of them, why not?  whats the worst that can happen? you burn a trade, big whoop.  They wont lose value.    And if they pump out big numbers then you'll look like a genius and everyone else will have to scramble to catch up.... :)

BigBob

I'm a doogy man but dont normally put many doggie sin my side, however macrae has looked damn good. Reckon you need a couple of uniques and macrae (draft pick 5 or so remember) and stevens look juicy. It all gets a bit boring if we all choose daisy. I ditto Macrae to do a Wingard

gogonz

Pass.  Can't see any of them making ultra premium status and at that starting price, not great cash cows either.  Could be an interesting POD in the early rounds but they'll probably cost you points elsewhere and eventually, a trade without a huge cash profit.

Keeper27

Quote from: gogonz on March 01, 2014, 10:41:01 AM
Pass.  Can't see any of them making ultra premium status and at that starting price, not great cash cows either.  Could be an interesting POD in the early rounds but they'll probably cost you points elsewhere and eventually, a trade without a huge cash profit.

why do they need to go "ultra premium" ?? ???
Macrae is priced at 61, if he can go 90+ which is a big possibility he'd make $150K then you can upgrade him to a proper premium.
you'll be getting a close to premium score for a bargain. use him as a stepping stone like Daisy.

my question is Daisy a better choice than Stevens/Wallis (already got Macrae)

colmullet

Quote from: Keeper27 on March 01, 2014, 01:18:00 PM
Quote from: gogonz on March 01, 2014, 10:41:01 AM
Pass.  Can't see any of them making ultra premium status and at that starting price, not great cash cows either.  Could be an interesting POD in the early rounds but they'll probably cost you points elsewhere and eventually, a trade without a huge cash profit.

why do they need to go "ultra premium" ?? ???
Macrae is priced at 61, if he can go 90+ which is a big possibility he'd make $150K then you can upgrade him to a proper premium.
you'll be getting a close to premium score for a bargain. use him as a stepping stone like Daisy.

my question is Daisy a better choice than Stevens/Wallis (already got Macrae)

Daisy is definitely the standout choice in this price range, but i think i am going to take one of Stevens/Macrae aswell, i think 90+ is within reach for both