Main Menu

Polec

Started by browny_wce, February 25, 2014, 08:09:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

browny_wce

nothing too crazy herewith young Polec...
but welcome to Brownys Brilliant son

Jukes

...was this really worth a topic?

powersuperkents

He has been amazing so far. Fantasy wise and watching him. I'm so happy that Hinkley made the trade, I think he'll be more effective for our team then MacCarthy

But gotta agree with Jukes hahahaha

browny_wce

Quote from: Jukes on February 25, 2014, 08:35:43 PM
...was this really worth a topic?
Throwing out love is always worth a topic

powersuperkents

Seriously watched the whole game and he is fantastic. Impey was great against the crows but a let down when he's thrown in with the big guns and Matt White was incredibly disappointing. I don't think Richmond supporters will be missing him at all (the fact they dumped Nahas, McGuane et al makes me consider his future if Hinkley didn't sign him). But maybe my call on White is premature.

jamfrank

I've also locked in Polec. Anyone have any thoughts on Clurey? Reckon he can get a spot this year?

jvalles69


powersuperkents

I've always had Polec locked, even if he scored 20's his price tag and better js would still mean he's locked (I think him and Ellis were locks from the beginning with everyone). The only difference is now I feel safe about the pick and know that I could play him in M8 if Claye Beams doesn't perform.

Thunderbolts

Quote from: powersuperkents on February 26, 2014, 01:58:49 PM
I've always had Polec locked, even if he scored 20's his price tag and better js would still mean he's locked (I think him and Ellis were locks from the beginning with everyone). The only difference is now I feel safe about the pick and know that I could play him in M8 if Claye Beams doesn't perform.

+1 agree with ya on M8 spot

jvalles69

Quote from: powersuperkents on February 26, 2014, 01:58:49 PM
I've always had Polec locked, even if he scored 20's his price tag and better js would still mean he's locked (I think him and Ellis were locks from the beginning with everyone). The only difference is now I feel safe about the pick and know that I could play him in M8 if Claye Beams doesn't perform.

At this stage I've got Michie in their too with those two guys.  Miche, Ellis and Polec All look better than Beams at this point.

timmyparso

Quote from: jamfrank on February 26, 2014, 12:28:51 AM
I've also locked in Polec. Anyone have any thoughts on Clurey? Reckon he can get a spot this year?

Not with trengove and Carlisle to return to team, may get odd game through year but not regular

powersuperkents

Quote from: timmyparso on February 26, 2014, 09:35:12 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on February 26, 2014, 12:28:51 AM
I've also locked in Polec. Anyone have any thoughts on Clurey? Reckon he can get a spot this year?

Not with trengove and Carlisle to return to team, may get odd game through year but not regular
:-\ Just traded him in for Fuller but didn't take Trengove & Carlisle's absence isn't account. Yeah I've got to agree with you I can't see him getting a game with those two back.

I was thinking of going Grundy-> Currie in the rucks and playing Sandi in R2 rather than R3. This leaves me with $296k but the only player I can consider upgrading are Fasolo-> Wingard or C. Beams-> Limited option midfielder. Can anyone provide me with some guidance. If I go back to Grundy this leaves me with Nic Nat, Grundy & Sandi (an extremely stable ruck line) rather than Nic Nat, Sandi, Currie & Thurlow (who is included in both line ups)

fertalong

Quote from: powersuperkents on February 27, 2014, 09:25:19 PM
Quote from: timmyparso on February 26, 2014, 09:35:12 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on February 26, 2014, 12:28:51 AM
I've also locked in Polec. Anyone have any thoughts on Clurey? Reckon he can get a spot this year?

Not with trengove and Carlisle to return to team, may get odd game through year but not regular
:-\ Just traded him in for Fuller but didn't take Trengove & Carlisle's absence isn't account. Yeah I've got to agree with you I can't see him getting a game with those two back.

I was thinking of going Grundy-> Currie in the rucks and playing Sandi in R2 rather than R3. This leaves me with $296k but the only player I can consider upgrading are Fasolo-> Wingard or C. Beams-> Limited option midfielder. Can anyone provide me with some guidance. If I go back to Grundy this leaves me with Nic Nat, Grundy & Sandi (an extremely stable ruck line) rather than Nic Nat, Sandi, Currie & Thurlow (who is included in both line ups)

I'd drop Grundy and run with NicNat/Sandi combo. Your 2 bench players 'should' get early games and be half decent backups (I'd expect about 50 from each).
Grundy has shown us in NAB Challenge that he is not quite mature enough and will give away silly free kicks when things dont go his way. It tends to throw him off his game and will affect his output.

Fasolo 'should' avg 70+ by year's end, but I doubt he will score very well early on. Watching the game he played, it felt like he is still a little underdone. Wingard hasn't looked like slowing down and will probably improve on last year. I'd take Wingard any day (Though, Tom Mitchell is better if you don't already have him).

powersuperkents

Quote from: fertalong on February 28, 2014, 12:43:19 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on February 27, 2014, 09:25:19 PM
Quote from: timmyparso on February 26, 2014, 09:35:12 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on February 26, 2014, 12:28:51 AM
I've also locked in Polec. Anyone have any thoughts on Clurey? Reckon he can get a spot this year?

Not with trengove and Carlisle to return to team, may get odd game through year but not regular
:-\ Just traded him in for Fuller but didn't take Trengove & Carlisle's absence isn't account. Yeah I've got to agree with you I can't see him getting a game with those two back.

I was thinking of going Grundy-> Currie in the rucks and playing Sandi in R2 rather than R3. This leaves me with $296k but the only player I can consider upgrading are Fasolo-> Wingard or C. Beams-> Limited option midfielder. Can anyone provide me with some guidance. If I go back to Grundy this leaves me with Nic Nat, Grundy & Sandi (an extremely stable ruck line) rather than Nic Nat, Sandi, Currie & Thurlow (who is included in both line ups)

I'd drop Grundy and run with NicNat/Sandi combo. Your 2 bench players 'should' get early games and be half decent backups (I'd expect about 50 from each).
Grundy has shown us in NAB Challenge that he is not quite mature enough and will give away silly free kicks when things dont go his way. It tends to throw him off his game and will affect his output.

Fasolo 'should' avg 70+ by year's end, but I doubt he will score very well early on. Watching the game he played, it felt like he is still a little underdone. Wingard hasn't looked like slowing down and will probably improve on last year. I'd take Wingard any day (Though, Tom Mitchell is better if you don't already have him).
Just dumped Franklin so I can fit Tmitch in as a Swan's forward (although I already have Rohan). I'm a port supporter and that is solely the reason I'll most likely pick Wingard over TMitch. I'll have to give it a lot of though because Tmitch is an amazing player and to have him in the forwards minimizes any risk of 2nd year blues (same goes for Chad). Now I have to decide between Derickx and Currie for R3 haha