Jobe Watson

Started by Anthonyyyy, February 23, 2014, 02:29:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bully

Quote from: Dayze on February 23, 2014, 07:53:00 PM
I have absolutely no interest in Murphy but daizy was tempting.
I don't see daizy as a keeper. I figure ill save a trade down the track which is worth 100k.
Cotch is in 10% of midfields which I love. Round 8 bye will keep him nice and unique.
Rocky jobe and beams pick themselves IMO so I had to decide between Gaz and pendles

I have suckling at d5.

So where have you compromised? Forwards or rucks?

hawkers65

Quote from: Bully on February 23, 2014, 07:57:41 PM
Quote from: Dayze on February 23, 2014, 07:53:00 PM
I have absolutely no interest in Murphy but daizy was tempting.
I don't see daizy as a keeper. I figure ill save a trade down the track which is worth 100k.
Cotch is in 10% of midfields which I love. Round 8 bye will keep him nice and unique.
Rocky jobe and beams pick themselves IMO so I had to decide between Gaz and pendles

I have suckling at d5.

So where have you compromised? Forwards or rucks?

Runnng with the same midfield and dont feel i've compromised anywhere!

Mitchell, Simpson, Swallow, Suckling + 2 rookies
Ablett, Watson, Rocky, Cotchin, Beams + 3 rookies
Lobbe, Sandi
Danger, Martin, Franklin, Gunston, Pav + 1 rookie

Yeah my backs are weak, but thats beacuse of my Fwds, not mids, could easily go Franklin to Hurn/Hibberd type and then no where is weak, but like the 5 premo fwd strategy at this stage.

H1bb3i2d

Quote from: hawkers65 on February 23, 2014, 08:02:43 PM
Quote from: Bully on February 23, 2014, 07:57:41 PM
Quote from: Dayze on February 23, 2014, 07:53:00 PM
I have absolutely no interest in Murphy but daizy was tempting.
I don't see daizy as a keeper. I figure ill save a trade down the track which is worth 100k.
Cotch is in 10% of midfields which I love. Round 8 bye will keep him nice and unique.
Rocky jobe and beams pick themselves IMO so I had to decide between Gaz and pendles

I have suckling at d5.

So where have you compromised? Forwards or rucks?

Runnng with the same midfield and dont feel i've compromised anywhere!

Mitchell, Simpson, Swallow, Suckling + 2 rookies
Ablett, Watson, Rocky, Cotchin, Beams + 3 rookies
Lobbe, Sandi
Danger, Martin, Franklin, Gunston, Pav + 1 rookie

Yeah my backs are weak, but thats beacuse of my Fwds, not mids, could easily go Franklin to Hurn/Hibberd type and then no where is weak, but like the 5 premo fwd strategy at this stage.

Very strong forwards too, but you might find it a struggle to get 4 backline rookies!!

Bully

Quote from: hawkers65 on February 23, 2014, 08:02:43 PM
Quote from: Bully on February 23, 2014, 07:57:41 PM
Quote from: Dayze on February 23, 2014, 07:53:00 PM
I have absolutely no interest in Murphy but daizy was tempting.
I don't see daizy as a keeper. I figure ill save a trade down the track which is worth 100k.
Cotch is in 10% of midfields which I love. Round 8 bye will keep him nice and unique.
Rocky jobe and beams pick themselves IMO so I had to decide between Gaz and pendles

I have suckling at d5.

So where have you compromised? Forwards or rucks?

Runnng with the same midfield and dont feel i've compromised anywhere!

Mitchell, Simpson, Swallow, Suckling + 2 rookies
Ablett, Watson, Rocky, Cotchin, Beams + 3 rookies
Lobbe, Sandi
Danger, Martin, Franklin, Gunston, Pav + 1 rookie

Yeah my backs are weak, but thats beacuse of my Fwds, not mids, could easily go Franklin to Hurn/Hibberd type and then no where is weak, but like the 5 premo fwd strategy at this stage.

But you are banking on 4 defensive rookies, apart from McDonald I' think you'll find the cupboard is very bare.

Dayze

My backs are Mitchell hibberd Simpson Hansen suckling McDonald

Nic Nat sandi. If nic Nat isn't ok going leunberger.

Danger dusty Franklin gray rookies x4
Of course all of these are dependent on rookies.
I think there will b more defense rookies than people think. There will b at least two cheapies I reckon
I don't feel I've compromised anywhere. Maybe our compromise is leaving out pendles.

Love ya team hawkers. Can understand every decision uv made. All players on my radar.

Rossiii

I'm tossing up between Libba and jobe.. Libba seems to have a higher ceiling although jobe is known to go large.. Both potential pods this year too.. More so Libba

HotTiges

If Cotchin didn't have rd8 bye I'd pick him but not shattered picking Jobe!

hawkers65

Quote from: Dayze on February 23, 2014, 09:37:16 PM
My backs are Mitchell hibberd Simpson Hansen suckling McDonald

Nic Nat sandi. If nic Nat isn't ok going leunberger.

Danger dusty Franklin gray rookies x4
Of course all of these are dependent on rookies.
I think there will b more defense rookies than people think. There will b at least two cheapies I reckon
I don't feel I've compromised anywhere. Maybe our compromise is leaving out pendles.

Love ya team hawkers. Can understand every decision uv made. All players on my radar.


Haha thx, yeah, first time for sometime where i've had that feeling of satisfaction when looking at my side. Most of this pre-season i've been unhappy with it. Feels good for a change! :o

Dayze

I love the Libba pick aswell. Can't have them all unfortunately

Bully

Quote from: Dayze on February 23, 2014, 09:37:16 PM

I think there will b more defense rookies than people think. There will b at least two cheapies I reckon
I don't feel I've compromised anywhere. Maybe our compromise is leaving out pendles.


I wish I shared your optimism but cheap could wind up being 160 - 200k.

GCSkiwi

Quote from: Bully on February 23, 2014, 09:53:40 PM
Quote from: Dayze on February 23, 2014, 09:37:16 PM

I think there will b more defense rookies than people think. There will b at least two cheapies I reckon
I don't feel I've compromised anywhere. Maybe our compromise is leaving out pendles.


I wish I shared your optimism but cheap could wind up being 160 - 200k.

+1 I'd be intrigued to know who is pencilled in other than L.Macdonald. I have Langford and Fuller pencilled in but will have to cull a prem if they don't get up, and I'm by no means confident they will.

Ricochet

Watson is a gun pick. Underpriced and will bounce back to 115+

E-Lemon_ator

Leave him out at your peril!



Hippo

Quote from: Ricochet on February 24, 2014, 11:24:10 AM
Watson is a gun pick. Underpriced and will bounce back to 115+
This!

dmac07

Locked at m3, ablett, pendles, watson, beams, rooks. Only decision is whether to downgrade a back/fwd to get daisy at m5.