Danger and/or Dusty

blues boy · February 21, 2014, 06:23:27 PM

I would be shocked if people weren't starting with either of them. But was just wondering who is more likely to lose value quicker?
Or would it just be wiser to start with both?

jvalles69 · February 21, 2014, 06:29:49 PM

For some reason I don't trust Dusty this year, or at least don't think he will hold his value to start with. I think Danger has more chance of holding his value.

Artax · February 21, 2014, 07:25:47 PM

Thinking of Mitchell over Dusty now and using the cash elsewhere.

Nervous as I also have Lance & Gary.

blues boy · February 21, 2014, 11:45:24 PM

Quote from: Artax on February 21, 2014, 07:25:47 PM
Thinking of Mitchell over Dusty now and using the cash elsewhere.

Nervous as I also have Lance & Gary.

thats the one thing stopping me from dropping one of these two for mitchell because i also have buddy and gaz

Chelskiman · February 22, 2014, 12:59:42 AM

They were both my first two picked forwards in all formats of fantasy this year and both have remained in my sides ever since.

Thunderbolts · February 22, 2014, 08:39:55 AM

Gotta have both of them locked n loaded into F1/F2. Without them your gonna shoot yourself in the foot. ;)

Windigo · February 22, 2014, 11:45:37 AM

The majority of teams will have both, I don't see any real reason why you wouldn't start with both of them TBH.

jvalles69 · February 22, 2014, 12:03:12 PM

Quote from: Windigo on February 22, 2014, 11:45:37 AM
The majority of teams will have both, I don't see any real reason why you wouldn't start with both of them TBH.

I can think of one...the fact that Riewoldt may start the year off better that either of them?

henry · February 22, 2014, 02:10:28 PM

Quote from: Chelskiman on February 22, 2014, 12:59:42 AM
They were both my first two picked forwards in all formats of fantasy this year and both have remained in my sides ever since.

Yep same here, will both easily be in the top 6 forwards probably top 3 barring injury.

Jukes · February 22, 2014, 02:43:27 PM

Quote from: Windigo on February 22, 2014, 11:45:37 AM
The majority of teams will have both, I don't see any real reason why you wouldn't start with both of them TBH.

Because neither of them will increase in average by much?

I have both, dw.

Adamant · February 22, 2014, 04:26:00 PM

Just Danger for me at this stage, Martin will be my first forward upgrade target.

pommyadam · February 22, 2014, 05:09:39 PM

just Danger for me

still a little wary of Martin's new role, and he's slightly out of my price range

Chelskiman · February 23, 2014, 12:42:05 AM

Quote from: pommyadam on February 22, 2014, 05:09:39 PM
just Danger for me

still a little wary of Martin's new role, and he's slightly out of my price range

I highly doubt Martin will play in the backline all season. I think we're just trying him there while we can in pre-season. Plus, you saw what he did today, so if anything his scoring could improve this year as we looked to get the ball in his hands at every opportunity off the half back line.

hardnut · February 23, 2014, 02:30:21 AM

Dusty will be tagged if he plays of HB. I'm just going to wait and see not like his value is going to rise much. I'm running the Danger/Titchell combo and passing on Franklin too

Money · February 23, 2014, 02:43:00 AM

Quote from: hardnut on February 23, 2014, 02:30:21 AM
Dusty will be tagged if he plays of HB. I'm just going to wait and see not like his value is going to rise much. I'm running the Danger/Titchell combo and passing on Franklin too

If one of your reasons to not go Martin is because he won't rise in value then it'd just be silly to get on Mitchell and then not Franklin, Mitchell won't rise much in value at all IMO, he could get 92-95 but I realistically see him at 86-89 and Martin could get 99-105 so in terms of value Titch is actually worse off compared to Martin (not by much but still less) and then Franklin should increase his 79 average to about 90+ so really he has the best value out of all of them

Danger and/or Dusty

Adamant