Ben Cunnington vs Jack Ziebell (Poll)

Started by North Melbournes Finest, February 13, 2014, 02:42:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Grufflez

Quote from: Ricochet on February 14, 2014, 11:41:41 AM
Um basically its Desired Average = (Desired Profit + Current Price) / Magic Number

My criteria for picking mid pricers is a) can they make 100-150k+ or b) can they jump into the top bracket for their position.

Agree if you can't get at least 100k from your stepping stones cut em'

North Melbournes Finest

Quote from: Grufflez on February 14, 2014, 12:58:13 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on February 14, 2014, 11:41:41 AM
Um basically its Desired Average = (Desired Profit + Current Price) / Magic Number

My criteria for picking mid pricers is a) can they make 100-150k+ or b) can they jump into the top bracket for their position.

Agree if you can't get at least 100k from your stepping stones cut em'
I think atleast one of them could become upper elite player though.

demon_spud

Ziebell gets rubbed out a few times, the MRP don't like him, soft tackle and gone for 3, those Hawk's hits harder and got nothing.

So I'll take the extra 200-300 points for the season with Cunnington.

Hopefully Ben will get more consistent, had a high of 151 Melbourne and a 47 v Cats rnd 1. His eff% is fantastic though last year compared to Ziebell. All signs show a further lift in his avg as he has gone from strength to strength.

Ziebells just as inconsistent, and that 161 v Pies was a monster, which skewed his avg.

Both should avg 100s, with Swallow out for half a season still will need to consider how his return will be if to consider either of these as a keeper.