Ben Cunnington vs Jack Ziebell (Poll)

North Melbournes Finest · February 13, 2014, 02:42:07 PM

Who will score more this year?

Apparently Jack Ziebell has dropped 6 kilo's and is ready to play more of the game on the field, but then you have the consistency of Ben Cunnington. They're both surely going to get better from natural progression.

Dayze · February 13, 2014, 03:20:13 PM

Cunnington for me.
Ziebell kicks the ball more often but cunnington has the perfect career trajectory.
Ziebell has stalled a little bit.
All signs point towards a breakout for both.
Both are contested beasts.
Pity supercoach doesn't really reward a midfield breakout.
Round 8 bye aswell means its almost not worth attempting.

Interesting to see how the new sub rule will impact ziebell, who from memory was the most rotated player in the afl.

North Melbournes Finest · February 13, 2014, 04:24:29 PM

Quote from: Dayze on February 13, 2014, 03:20:13 PM
Cunnington for me.
Ziebell kicks the ball more often but cunnington has the perfect career trajectory.
Ziebell has stalled a little bit.
All signs point towards a breakout for both.
Both are contested beasts.
Pity supercoach doesn't really reward a midfield breakout.
Round 8 bye aswell means its almost not worth attempting.

Interesting to see how the new sub rule will impact ziebell, who from memory was the most rotated player in the afl.

Correct, I read an article that said he was benched 11.8 times a game, but apparently he's fitter than he's ever been now.

shorty3264 · February 13, 2014, 04:28:05 PM

Ziebell. Both will be stars. But I just think he has out and out star written all over him. Also has the ability to kick goals. I'm going with Ziebell, just. If I was picking averages I'd say JZ -102 BC - 99

Jroo · February 13, 2014, 04:41:38 PM

Quote from: shorty3264 on February 13, 2014, 04:28:05 PM
Ziebell. Both will be stars. But I just think he has out and out star written all over him. Also has the ability to kick goals. I'm going with Ziebell, just. If I was picking averages I'd say JZ -102 BC - 99

+1, I really like Ziebell. I think he has the potential to score better than Cunnington, he finds the ball and kicks goals.

Dayze · February 13, 2014, 05:16:34 PM

Ziebell reminds me of voss. Bit flashier than cunnington.
Both could go 105+

Keeper27 · February 13, 2014, 05:26:45 PM

Quote from: Dayze on February 13, 2014, 05:16:34 PM
Ziebell reminds me of voss. Bit flashier than cunnington.
Both could go 105+

agreed.The Rnd 8 bye kills it though.

Sabretooth Tigers · February 13, 2014, 06:11:04 PM

:(
Ziebell for me too.

Vinny · February 13, 2014, 06:11:55 PM

Ziebell, I'm expecting a hugeeeee year!

Grufflez · February 13, 2014, 09:30:36 PM

Quote from: Dayze on February 13, 2014, 03:20:13 PM
Cunnington for me.
Ziebell kicks the ball more often but cunnington has the perfect career trajectory.
Ziebell has stalled a little bit.
All signs point towards a breakout for both.
Both are contested beasts.
Pity supercoach doesn't really reward a midfield breakout.
Round 8 bye aswell means its almost not worth attempting.

Interesting to see how the new sub rule will impact ziebell, who from memory was the most rotated player in the afl.

Someone's been reading the same great article from SCS as i have..go with the Cunny :D

alldaylong · February 13, 2014, 11:02:06 PM

Ziebell i think. At the price of those 2 they would want to be a keeper. If its true about Jack shedding a couple of kgs ill be looking at him myself. Always felt he was a bit to big, but with extra pace and endurance i think he will break out

Dayze · February 14, 2014, 01:58:06 AM

Quote from: Grufflez on February 13, 2014, 09:30:36 PM
Quote from: Dayze on February 13, 2014, 03:20:13 PM
Cunnington for me.
Ziebell kicks the ball more often but cunnington has the perfect career trajectory.
Ziebell has stalled a little bit.
All signs point towards a breakout for both.
Both are contested beasts.
Pity supercoach doesn't really reward a midfield breakout.
Round 8 bye aswell means its almost not worth attempting.

Interesting to see how the new sub rule will impact ziebell, who from memory was the most rotated player in the afl.

Someone's been reading the same great article from SCS as i have..go with the Cunny :D

That rowsus guy is absolutely fkn amazing.
U read his share trading articles? Off the hook.
Smart man.

Ricochet · February 14, 2014, 11:04:13 AM

Neither tbh. At their price and averages they will need to average 114+ to a) make you more than 100k and b) be a top 8 mid based on last years scores. And 114 just seems too much of a risk for me

Vinny · February 14, 2014, 11:05:44 AM

Ric, how do you work out how much x player needs to average to make x amount of money?

Ricochet · February 14, 2014, 11:41:41 AM

Um basically its Desired Average = (Desired Profit + Current Price) / Magic Number

My criteria for picking mid pricers is a) can they make 100-150k+ or b) can they jump into the top bracket for their position.