F4

[The Pelican]

I have $480,300 to spend on my F4. I can't decide out of Parker, Gunston, Zorko and Pav

[GoLions]

I have both Pav and Gunston, so either of them I would say. Zorko's role at Brisbane isn't fantasy friendly, so would stay away for now. Don't know much on Parker.

[SydneyRox]

i may be a touch biased, but i think parker is primed for a breakout and despite being listed as a fwd, will spend almost all his time in the mids.
I dont trust gunston to deliver straight away.
The article on zorko has me looking, but getting so badly burnt last year makes me nervous
Pav is a good choice as long as he plays some NAB time

[Mat0369]

i may be a touch biased, but i think parker is primed for a breakout and despite being listed as a fwd, will spend almost all his time in the mids.
I dont trust gunston to deliver straight away.
The article on zorko has me looking, but getting so badly burnt last year makes me nervous
Pav is a good choice as long as he plays some NAB time

He looked good all through the NAB last year before flopping big time. Zorko and Karnezis caused a lot of damage to teams last season

[GM]

Parker or Pav mate.
Watch NAB closely.

[batt]

Pav "looking like a teenager" in pre-season training is very encouraging.  The marvel of him is he has proven he can be just as productive as a pure forward, so there isn't a great deal of risk involved with scoring potential, only a fitness issue.

[dmac07]

Not sold on Parker, going to be very good but see him in the same situation as someone like Sidebottom at Collingwood, ready to break out but only so many kidgield points available. Its easy to assume Jack, JPK, Hanneberry all average more in the mids, and cant see their 4th best mid going higher than 95. Especially when you look at McVeigh also going 100+, and 90+for Tippet/Franklin fwd.