my team no elites...

westy501 · February 03, 2014, 09:06:16 PM

Hi guys heres my team. ive cheaped out on ablett and pendels... but based on the way my team looks I cant complain... whats peoples thoughts...

TEAM NAME: westycles
DEF: J. McVeigh, S. Mitchell, S. Thompson, M. Suckling, L. McDonald, M. Fuller (J. Ashby, J. Battersby)
MID: R. Griffen, J. Watson, N. Fyfe, N. Dal Santo, D. Beams, D. Thomas, J. Martin, L. Dunstan (A. Morabito, M. Crouch)
RUC: C. Dixon, A. Sandilands (D. Currie, F. Thurlow)
FWD: P. Dangerfield, C. Wingard, J. Roughead, M. Pavlich, P. Karnezis, D. Garlett (M. Honeychurch, J. Impey)
CASH LEFT: $2,100

Also my team name is locked so I don't need comments on that. Cheers!

nick wilkesmann · February 03, 2014, 09:42:10 PM

man the team looks sweet.... but you at least need pendlebury. I started without him last year and spent the whole time hurting from that poor decision, he is consistent as f, and you lose out every week you don't have him.

westy501 · February 03, 2014, 10:07:37 PM

Quote from: nick wilkesmann on February 03, 2014, 09:42:10 PM
man the team looks sweet.... but you at least need pendlebury. I started without him last year and spent the whole time hurting from that poor decision, he is consistent as f, and you lose out every week you don't have him.

im a pies supporter so I was locked on pendles all pre season. stoked he became the pies captain... but the second I took him out, my team became awesome... its a 10/10/10 bye split aswell... other then the pendles factor and obviously how the nab goes im fair happy... still playing with the rookies aswell

tor01doc · February 03, 2014, 10:34:00 PM

10/10/10 at this stage is unnecessary.

However, having one of either Ablett or Pendles is not.

Vinny · February 03, 2014, 10:34:58 PM

Great squad.

Lacking a superstar which you need being one of Ablett and Pendles.

Preferablly 2 of Ablett, Pendles or Jelwood.

Other than that, good choice of premiums.

Don't worry too much about getting a 10-10-10 bye as injuries, suspensions and early trades will flower that up anyway.

Good luck.

westy501 · February 03, 2014, 10:39:30 PM

yeah I just added the 10/10/10 for the sake of it... honestly 8/10/12 is a better stradegy... I just added the fact... if your rd 10 players are the rookies then you can have 15... half would be traded out by rd 10 any... im not hung up on the bye rounds...

tor01doc · February 03, 2014, 10:49:50 PM

You'd certainly need big westycles to go in without either Ablett or Pendles.

Vinny · February 03, 2014, 10:51:45 PM

Quote from: tor01doc on February 03, 2014, 10:49:50 PM
You'd certainly need big westycles to go in without either Ablett or Pendles.

Hahaha Listen to the doctor mate.

westy501 · February 03, 2014, 11:18:29 PM

Quote from: tor01doc on February 03, 2014, 10:49:50 PM
You'd certainly need big westycles to go in without either Ablett or Pendles.

haha tops call... im going to throw this out... everyone talks about pendles and ablett... I haven't been living under a rock... I know why these names are 'must haves' but it was swan and ablett last year... swan fell... swallow push fwd ablett move fwd... good chance the 2 elitists become not as eliteists... big risk but I think Watson is huge potential...most swans players are huge potential... most of north Melbourne I want in my squad... zeiball especially... but round 8 byes screw my north picks... I like my squad barring a few rookie changes and ill trade the likes of pendels and ablett in after the bye rounds if it means I save trades elswhere

tor01doc · February 03, 2014, 11:20:04 PM

Swan in DT. Pendles is Queen of SC.