Jayman's Team Thread 2014

Started by Jay, January 30, 2014, 02:40:02 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ricochet

Maybe Langdon to Jaensch and then Langford to Litherland for some cash mate?

Ringo

As there are no defender rookies playing atm I would be looking at these 2 trades to complete defence Langdon  to Jaensch and then Langford to a 200/300k defender who is assured of games as bench cover,

Don't laugh but Dawson, Delaney who are priced at just over #200k will play games and will be good for points.

Jay

Quote from: Ricochet on June 05, 2014, 11:49:00 PM
Maybe Langdon to Jaensch and then Langford to Litherland for some cash mate?
Yeah I like that. Would have 600k to spend on a defender, what's the reasoning to pick Jaensch? :)

Ricochet

Quote from: Jayman on June 06, 2014, 04:09:48 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on June 05, 2014, 11:49:00 PM
Maybe Langdon to Jaensch and then Langford to Litherland for some cash mate?
Yeah I like that. Would have 600k to spend on a defender, what's the reasoning to pick Jaensch? :)
Oh he's just some spud from some spud team ;) haha. Nah I think his numbers this year speak for themselves.

Jay

Quote from: Ricochet on June 06, 2014, 04:11:46 PM
Quote from: Jayman on June 06, 2014, 04:09:48 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on June 05, 2014, 11:49:00 PM
Maybe Langdon to Jaensch and then Langford to Litherland for some cash mate?
Yeah I like that. Would have 600k to spend on a defender, what's the reasoning to pick Jaensch? :)
Oh he's just some spud from some spud team ;) haha. Nah I think his numbers this year speak for themselves.
From a Crows fan perspective, I've just never rated him. Which is why I'm hesitant to bring him in!

But a 94 average at 417k with a breakeven of 47... He does look a good buy.

Ricochet

Quote from: Jayman on June 06, 2014, 04:23:09 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on June 06, 2014, 04:11:46 PM
Quote from: Jayman on June 06, 2014, 04:09:48 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on June 05, 2014, 11:49:00 PM
Maybe Langdon to Jaensch and then Langford to Litherland for some cash mate?
Yeah I like that. Would have 600k to spend on a defender, what's the reasoning to pick Jaensch? :)
Oh he's just some spud from some spud team ;) haha. Nah I think his numbers this year speak for themselves.
From a Crows fan perspective, I've just never rated him. Which is why I'm hesitant to bring him in!

But a 94 average at 417k with a breakeven of 47... He does look a good buy.
And he's been consistent too. With a 38 bringing down his average when he broke his ribs.

From an outsider it looks like he's taken over Henderson's role from last year?

Jay

Quote from: Ricochet on June 06, 2014, 04:24:53 PM
Quote from: Jayman on June 06, 2014, 04:23:09 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on June 06, 2014, 04:11:46 PM
Quote from: Jayman on June 06, 2014, 04:09:48 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on June 05, 2014, 11:49:00 PM
Maybe Langdon to Jaensch and then Langford to Litherland for some cash mate?
Yeah I like that. Would have 600k to spend on a defender, what's the reasoning to pick Jaensch? :)
Oh he's just some spud from some spud team ;) haha. Nah I think his numbers this year speak for themselves.
From a Crows fan perspective, I've just never rated him. Which is why I'm hesitant to bring him in!

But a 94 average at 417k with a breakeven of 47... He does look a good buy.
And he's been consistent too. With a 38 bringing down his average when he broke his ribs.

From an outsider it looks like he's taken over Henderson's role from last year?
Yeah seems he has taken over that role. But I don't see Hendo's return affecting him.

The question is, does he represent more value than a Pearce Hanley?

Ricochet

Quote from: Jayman on June 06, 2014, 04:36:52 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on June 06, 2014, 04:24:53 PM
Quote from: Jayman on June 06, 2014, 04:23:09 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on June 06, 2014, 04:11:46 PM
Quote from: Jayman on June 06, 2014, 04:09:48 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on June 05, 2014, 11:49:00 PM
Maybe Langdon to Jaensch and then Langford to Litherland for some cash mate?
Yeah I like that. Would have 600k to spend on a defender, what's the reasoning to pick Jaensch? :)
Oh he's just some spud from some spud team ;) haha. Nah I think his numbers this year speak for themselves.
From a Crows fan perspective, I've just never rated him. Which is why I'm hesitant to bring him in!

But a 94 average at 417k with a breakeven of 47... He does look a good buy.
And he's been consistent too. With a 38 bringing down his average when he broke his ribs.

From an outsider it looks like he's taken over Henderson's role from last year?
Yeah seems he has taken over that role. But I don't see Hendo's return affecting him.

The question is, does he represent more value than a Pearce Hanley?
I would say so. Hanley would most likely cop more tags/attention than Jaensch would. Although he might get attention now after the start he has had this year. And he plays Freo this week. Tough one

Jay


Ricochet

How about Watson to SJ for a profit and then next week upgrade shenton

Jay

Quote from: Ricochet on June 13, 2014, 09:17:33 AM
How about Watson to SJ for a profit and then next week upgrade shenton
Exactly what I was thinking :) let's hope SJ turns it around!

Ricochet

Quote from: Jayman on June 13, 2014, 12:34:33 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on June 13, 2014, 09:17:33 AM
How about Watson to SJ for a profit and then next week upgrade shenton
Exactly what I was thinking :) let's hope SJ turns it around!
Haha your not wrong, I brought him in too! Should kill the Saints though

Jay

This is why I don't complete my trades until the final teams are in :P SJ out!!!

Think I'll just hold Jobe for another week, bringing in Liberatore doesn't really appeal to me at that price.

Ricochet

I pulled the trigger because I thought I was out all day today :(

Vinny

I have the same bench and did the same trade Jay.

flower me ruined my week.