The $50 K Is Mine

Started by sam32, January 28, 2014, 04:28:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

sam32

Feedback and opinions would be much appreciated...
Am happy to return the favor as well!

Defence: McVeigh. Mitchell, Simpson, Swallow, Suckling, Laider/McDonald (Cuttler, Fuller)
Midfield: Ablett, Pendlebury, Watson, D.Beams, D.Thomas, Polec, Michie, Dunstan (Morabito, O'Rourke)
Rucks: Naitanui, Sandilnds (F.Thurlow, Nankervis)
Forwards: Dangerfield, Franklin, Gunston, Pavlich, M.Clark, D.Garlett (L.Taylor, J.Impey)

$22,700 remaining

shaker

That's the way be positive the only thing I can see is rucks are a bit risky see how Nic Nat goes in match conditions apart from that good solid team cheers

Ricochet

Not a bad team mate. Some great underpriced players in there. I'd just sit tight for now until the best rookies become more obvious

Anthonyyyy

I will have to settle for 2nd I guess  :P

anyways your defence is looking solid and I really like all of your first 5 picks and out of the last 2 I would go McDonald but also watch KK from Gold Coast as well! overall very solid 9/10 there just make sure your rookies are ok to go!

Your midfield is really strong also and I like to see both of Pendles and Ablett! Watson is a good pick and I also have him! Beams and Thomas are both steals  although I am only going with Thomas as I don't like Beams bye but I wish I could fit him in. Just make sure your rookies are playing.

Rucks are solid and they are standard. Usually I am against this but I think in your case it may be worth downgrading Nic Nat to McIntosh I will tell you what for later.

Forward line has been troubling me this year don't know if I should load up with rookies or go for none at all. Anyways Danger will be the most picked player of the year. I would like to see Martin in there for probably Pav as he is getting older. M.Clark is a good 80+ player when fit and I like all your rookies.

what I would do is
Nic Nat> McIntosh
Pav> Martin
and with left over cash try and get Martin in but I like Michie so try and get him in for Polec but if not go Dunsten to Ellis as Dunsten probably wont get a game!

hope that helped and could you possibly rate my team at http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,88894.0.html

dmac07

Quote from: sam32 on January 28, 2014, 04:28:12 PM
Feedback and opinions would be much appreciated...
Am happy to return the favor as well!

Defence: McVeigh. Mitchell, Simpson, Swallow, Suckling, Laider/McDonald (Cuttler, Fuller)
Midfield: Ablett, Pendlebury, Watson, D.Beams, D.Thomas, Polec, Michie, Dunstan (Morabito, O'Rourke)
Rucks: Naitanui, Sandilnds (F.Thurlow, Nankervis)
Forwards: Dangerfield, Franklin, Gunston, Pavlich, M.Clark, D.Garlett (L.Taylor, J.Impey)

$22,700 remaining


Def - Like having 5 solid players on this line, swallow could be primed for a breakout. 9/10
Mid - Three of the top premiums plus beams and thomas, not sure about the polec pick, look at martin, ellis, tyson. 11/15
Ruck - fairly standard set up, rucks hard to pick this year as not many great set and forget options 7/10
Fwd - danger a must pick, 4 key forwards after that would make me a little nervous though, buddy a good pick gunston, pav, clark all unknown and dont tjink any will be top 5-6 fwds. 5/10
Cash gen - mostly good rookie picks, would look at a few other options for mid rookies, maybe look at some of the cheaper options in the fwd line. 6/10
Unique - Swallow, gunston and pav all somewhat unique.  Not sold on gunston and pav though. 2/5.

Overall 40/60

Advice - mostly like the layout of this team. Fwd line could use some work, would look at trading gunston/pav to martin and one of fasolo, boyd, bock, hogan. Then if theres cash left get in j.martin for the mids.

johnnytheboy1

Def: No problems here would go with Mcdonald.
Mids; Good Choice of Premium and Rookies are Cheap.
Rucks Maybe Downgrade Nic Nat to someone like Lobbe or someone even Cheaper.
Fwds: Would Upgrade Pavlich as i think his ave will drop this year. Maybe Clark to Fasolo if he gets into the Magpies team from round 1

Team looks ok only a few changes needed give it an 7.5/10