Top 10 Greatest NBA Players of all-time

Started by Jay, January 27, 2014, 09:43:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

tbagrocks

makes no sense, but i'll help, here you go

keep

Andrew3737


tbagrocks

Ah passive aggressive again, well here ya go


Master Q

Quote from: Jayman on February 01, 2014, 11:50:34 AM
Quote from: Master Q on February 01, 2014, 10:50:47 AM
Quote from: Jayman on February 01, 2014, 10:47:59 AM
Quote from: Andrew3737 on January 31, 2014, 10:38:26 PM
Again, if you look at the stats and career achievements, LBJ is ahead.
Not in rings he isnt.
In MVPs he is.
Reckon lebron would swap his MVPs for rings of he could?
iirc there is quite a difference in age between the two.

Jay

Quote from: Master Q on February 01, 2014, 09:05:58 PM
Quote from: Jayman on February 01, 2014, 11:50:34 AM
Quote from: Master Q on February 01, 2014, 10:50:47 AM
Quote from: Jayman on February 01, 2014, 10:47:59 AM
Quote from: Andrew3737 on January 31, 2014, 10:38:26 PM
Again, if you look at the stats and career achievements, LBJ is ahead.
Not in rings he isnt.
In MVPs he is.
Reckon lebron would swap his MVPs for rings of he could?
iirc there is quite a difference in age between the two.
Dont be a smartass, just saying that when comparing superstars, rings are probably the main factor.

Mat0369

Quote from: Jayman on January 31, 2014, 12:15:02 AM
The fact that the silverware aspect is still extremely close is credit to MJ... Lebron should be at least a couple of MVPs + rings ahead of MJ when you consider the talent level of the guys MJ was up against compared to Lebron


Also don't forget to take into account that hand checking was legal through MJ's career and that you could play a much more physical style of defense.

Andrew3737

That also swings both ways with defense too. He prob couldn't get away with as physical defense as he did in his days, than the way the game is now.

Master Q

Quote from: Jayman on February 02, 2014, 01:33:21 AM
Quote from: Master Q on February 01, 2014, 09:05:58 PM
Quote from: Jayman on February 01, 2014, 11:50:34 AM
Quote from: Master Q on February 01, 2014, 10:50:47 AM
Quote from: Jayman on February 01, 2014, 10:47:59 AM
Quote from: Andrew3737 on January 31, 2014, 10:38:26 PM
Again, if you look at the stats and career achievements, LBJ is ahead.
Not in rings he isnt.
In MVPs he is.
Reckon lebron would swap his MVPs for rings of he could?
iirc there is quite a difference in age between the two.
Dont be a smartass, just saying that when comparing superstars, rings are probably the main factor.
Well I'm saying LeBron has plenty of time to get a few more rings. Obviously players would swap MVPs for a ring, but rings are team things. But rings are definitely not the main factor.

Jay

After much studying and research, I have come up with a new, flawless, indisputable top 10 ;)

1. Michael Jordan
2. Kareem Abdul-Jabaar
3. Magic Johnson
4. Larry Bird
5. Bill Russell
6. Shaquille O'Neal
7. Wilt Chamberlain
8. Tim Duncan
9. LeBron James
10. Hakeem Olajuwon

and just for reference, my next 10 are...

11. Kobe Bryant
12. Oscar Robertson
13. Karl Malone
14. David Robinson
15. Moses Malone
16. Jerry West
17. Julius Erving
18. Isiah Thomas
19. Charles Barkley
20. Bob Pettit

tbagrocks

Shaq too high imo, Charles and Kobe too low! Nice list for a young fella ;D

Jay

Quote from: tbagrocks on February 08, 2014, 09:37:23 PM
Shaq too high imo, Charles and Kobe too low! Nice list for a young fella ;D
The '0' in Charles' ring category is the only reason he is that low ;)

Andrew3737

Shaq too low. LBJ too low. Wilt, Russell, Bird too high and Kareem.

Jay

Quote from: Andrew3737 on February 09, 2014, 07:28:11 AM
Shaq too low. LBJ too low. Wilt, Russell, Bird too high and Kareem.
Shaq is just right, not putting him in front of any of MJ, Kareem, Magic Bird or Russell. For obvious reasons ::)

LBJ is basically #8, cant really split him and Duncan. When Lebron gets another ring, he'll leapfrog into 7th.

Not sure how you can say Russell is too high, with 5 mvp's and 11 rings. Its blasphemous to leave him outside the top 5.

Some people have Wilt a lot higher than 7th... Maybe he wasnt as much of a winner as other guys but he was brilliant stastically and is probably the most dominant force the game has ever seen.

I made sure that where ever I put Magic, I put Bird one spot below just because their rivalry was so even it wouldnt make sense to have them far apart in a top 10.

Please tell me how Kareem is too high? I looked at regular season numbers, playoff numbers, prime numbers, advanced stats and silverware... He is clear #2 GOAT

Windigo


Andrew3737

Again, Wilt was dominant in an era were it was score more than your opponent. There was no shot clock, no 3 second rule and n one cared about defense. The only defender that was any good was Russell. 11 rings and 5 MVP's, better put him number 1 then.

Shaq>Bird>Russell. I don't think we need to go into detail in how Shaq was better because it should be obvious.

Magic>Kareem, which is why you can't have him at 2. Top 5 should be clear as day.

Jordan
Magic
Kareem
Shaq
LeBron

Then it starts to get sticky.