Main Menu

WXV Discussion

Started by ossie85, August 06, 2013, 12:47:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

RaisyDaisy

You forgot to add Shuey's score in when Hanners is C

Hanners 228 + Shuey 106 = 334
Hanners 171 + Shuey 159 = 330

Ringo

Dah Thanks RD torpedoes argument and now basically shows there is not much difference then between Captain and CCs for me.


RaisyDaisy

Any team with a 110+ averaging player should go C

Any team without that is more likely to go CC just to try and reduce variance

That being said, luck will always play a big part

iZander

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on October 28, 2016, 10:57:25 AM
Any team with a 110+ averaging player should go C

Any team without that is more likely to go CC just to try and reduce variance

That being said, luck will always play a big part
Its more so to do with how big the difference is between your best and second best player :P Can imagine Berlin might have a pretty dangerous CC duo with Fyfe/Gawn next year?

And as Holz says, also who your playing and if you want the safer option or the higher/lower roof.

Torpedo10

Quote from: iZander on October 28, 2016, 11:04:29 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on October 28, 2016, 10:57:25 AM
Any team with a 110+ averaging player should go C

Any team without that is more likely to go CC just to try and reduce variance

That being said, luck will always play a big part
Its more so to do with how big the difference is between your best and second best player :P Can imagine Berlin might have a pretty dangerous CC duo with Fyfe/Gawn next year?

And as Holz says, also who your playing and if you want the safer option or the higher/lower roof.
That's if Maxy can keep it up, Rucks tend to fluctuate or get injured.

Ringo


RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Ringo on November 17, 2016, 09:20:03 AM
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-rookies-could-be-eligible-to-play-from-round-1-expanded-lists-as-soon-as-2018/news-story/4b9f814f27debec43c03fcf969477483

Given this development should we be doing away with our rookie list as well or at least allow them to play without restriction.

Saw that last night and thought the same thing

I'd say that once the AFL does it, we will too

Long overdue imo. Rookie lists and promotions are pointless

Purple 77

Yeah we'll only do it once the AFL does

Ringo

So if AFL allows Rookies from Rd 1 without promotions etc will we do the same? That is all our rookies can be named from Rd 1 maybe.

Ricochet

Quote from: Ringo on November 17, 2016, 04:33:43 PM
So if AFL allows Rookies from Rd 1 without promotions etc will we do the same? That is all our rookies can be named from Rd 1 maybe.
IMO it should only come into effect next year since some have traded for rookie picks, but don't really mind tbh

Purple 77

Hmm. I reckon we'll cross the bridge once we get to it

GoLions


Ricochet


Holz

Quote from: Ricochet on November 22, 2016, 05:54:04 PM
Lucky you grabbed TMac Holz  :-X

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2016-11-22/club-statement-chris-yarran

Sad news.

Well he is the reason i grabed tmac.

What happens now? Is he delisted.

I'm very anoyed i traded mackie for cap reasons

RaisyDaisy

That's sad news

Sounded like he was going well recently, even training too

I think you delist him now holz as he is not on any afl team list