WXV Discussion

[Holz]

The other comps don't complain as much because they are no where near as active as  World's. Apples and oranges

Is it a coincidence that the bulk of the complaining here usually involves Holz in one way or another, but no complaining in the comp he runs?

You're just not getting your way here like you can in Euro :P

I complain alot but far less then new york

[RaisyDaisy]

The other comps don't complain as much because they are no where near as active as  World's. Apples and oranges

Is it a coincidence that the bulk of the complaining here usually involves Holz in one way or another, but no complaining in the comp he runs?

You're just not getting your way here like you can in Euro :P

I complain alot but far less then new york

Our trades rarely ever get negged, so we don't complain

I am involved in a lot of the discussions in Worlds, but it's not complaining - if anything it's always the opposite

[GoLions]

The other comps don't complain as much because they are no where near as active as  World's. Apples and oranges

Is it a coincidence that the bulk of the complaining here usually involves Holz in one way or another, but no complaining in the comp he runs?

You're just not getting your way here like you can in Euro :P

I complain alot but far less then new york

Our trades rarely ever get negged, so we don't complain

I am involved in a lot of the discussions in Worlds, but it's not complaining - if anything it's always the opposite

Quit complaining RD and just accept the truth

[DazBurg]

I vote for a compensation pick.

we want 1 too  ;)

[Holz]

I vote for a compensation pick.

we want 1 too  ;)

check me one too

[Ricochet]

Any thoughts?

Is there any system where voting on trades could be done at any time and not structured.

Like as soon as a trade drops it can be voted on by whoever is online. Once it gets to a 4-5 (whateva it is) it passes unless Purps wants to reject it.

Messy but could it be done?

[Holz]

Any thoughts?

Is there any system where voting on trades could be done at any time and not structured.

Like as soon as a trade drops it can be voted on by whoever is online. Once it gets to a 4-5 (whateva it is) it passes unless Purps wants to reject it.

Messy but could it be done?

it would work as a comitee as the 5 would probably be guys who come on all the time. For example i would have recomended you and you live on here. Doesnt work with 18 coaches, many who arent that active and some who come on and dont look on the worlds board.

i dont think we can do anything to improve the broken system of 18 coaches unfortunately. Probably just have to leave it as it is.

[Ricochet]

Any thoughts?

Is there any system where voting on trades could be done at any time and not structured.

Like as soon as a trade drops it can be voted on by whoever is online. Once it gets to a 4-5 (whateva it is) it passes unless Purps wants to reject it.

Messy but could it be done?

it would work as a comitee as the 5 would probably be guys who come on all the time. For example i would have recomended you and you live on here. Doesnt work with 18 coaches, many who arent that active and some who come on and dont look on the worlds board.

i dont think we can do anything to improve the broken system of 18 coaches unfortunately. Probably just have to leave it as it is.

Nah you'd only need like 4-6 to be active and vote whenever they feel like it, could be as soon as they see it.

This way we're not waiting till Sunday every week

[Holz]

Any thoughts?

Is there any system where voting on trades could be done at any time and not structured.

Like as soon as a trade drops it can be voted on by whoever is online. Once it gets to a 4-5 (whateva it is) it passes unless Purps wants to reject it.

Messy but could it be done?

it would work as a comitee as the 5 would probably be guys who come on all the time. For example i would have recomended you and you live on here. Doesnt work with 18 coaches, many who arent that active and some who come on and dont look on the worlds board.

i dont think we can do anything to improve the broken system of 18 coaches unfortunately. Probably just have to leave it as it is.

Nah you'd only need like 4-6 to be active and vote whenever they feel like it, could be as soon as they see it.

This way we're not waiting till Sunday every week

the first 5 could vote yes then others come on after and vote no

[Ricochet]

Any thoughts?

Is there any system where voting on trades could be done at any time and not structured.

Like as soon as a trade drops it can be voted on by whoever is online. Once it gets to a 4-5 (whateva it is) it passes unless Purps wants to reject it.

Messy but could it be done?

it would work as a comitee as the 5 would probably be guys who come on all the time. For example i would have recomended you and you live on here. Doesnt work with 18 coaches, many who arent that active and some who come on and dont look on the worlds board.

i dont think we can do anything to improve the broken system of 18 coaches unfortunately. Probably just have to leave it as it is.

Nah you'd only need like 4-6 to be active and vote whenever they feel like it, could be as soon as they see it.

This way we're not waiting till Sunday every week

Actually just realised my mistake. It's 4-6 negs not 4-6 passes.

Still, wonder if it would work

[Holz]

Any thoughts?

Is there any system where voting on trades could be done at any time and not structured.

Like as soon as a trade drops it can be voted on by whoever is online. Once it gets to a 4-5 (whateva it is) it passes unless Purps wants to reject it.

Messy but could it be done?

it would work as a comitee as the 5 would probably be guys who come on all the time. For example i would have recomended you and you live on here. Doesnt work with 18 coaches, many who arent that active and some who come on and dont look on the worlds board.

i dont think we can do anything to improve the broken system of 18 coaches unfortunately. Probably just have to leave it as it is.

Nah you'd only need like 4-6 to be active and vote whenever they feel like it, could be as soon as they see it.

This way we're not waiting till Sunday every week

Actually just realised my mistake. It's 4-6 negs not 4-6 passes.

Still, wonder if it would work

i think the way it works is if 4-6 negs come in it fails

the system should be


0-6 passes
7-9 passes unless admin says no
10-12 fails unless admin says yes
13-18 fails

thats a true democracy. not 6-7 neg happy people having a majority on the competition.

[Ricochet]

How many "inactive" coaches do we have?

Hardly any. Maybe a Wednesday and Sunday voting process could work

[Torpedo10]

Any thoughts?

Is there any system where voting on trades could be done at any time and not structured.

Like as soon as a trade drops it can be voted on by whoever is online. Once it gets to a 4-5 (whateva it is) it passes unless Purps wants to reject it.

Messy but could it be done?

it would work as a comitee as the 5 would probably be guys who come on all the time. For example i would have recomended you and you live on here. Doesnt work with 18 coaches, many who arent that active and some who come on and dont look on the worlds board.

i dont think we can do anything to improve the broken system of 18 coaches unfortunately. Probably just have to leave it as it is.

Nah you'd only need like 4-6 to be active and vote whenever they feel like it, could be as soon as they see it.

This way we're not waiting till Sunday every week

Actually just realised my mistake. It's 4-6 negs not 4-6 passes.

Still, wonder if it would work

i think the way it works is if 4-6 negs come in it fails

the system should be


0-6 passes
7-9 passes unless admin says no
10-12 fails unless admin says yes
13-18 fails

thats a true democracy. not 6-7 neg happy people having a majority on the competition.

Have you been reading my PMs? Exactly what I put for Option E.

[Holz]

Any thoughts?

Is there any system where voting on trades could be done at any time and not structured.

Like as soon as a trade drops it can be voted on by whoever is online. Once it gets to a 4-5 (whateva it is) it passes unless Purps wants to reject it.

Messy but could it be done?

it would work as a comitee as the 5 would probably be guys who come on all the time. For example i would have recomended you and you live on here. Doesnt work with 18 coaches, many who arent that active and some who come on and dont look on the worlds board.

i dont think we can do anything to improve the broken system of 18 coaches unfortunately. Probably just have to leave it as it is.

Nah you'd only need like 4-6 to be active and vote whenever they feel like it, could be as soon as they see it.

This way we're not waiting till Sunday every week

Actually just realised my mistake. It's 4-6 negs not 4-6 passes.

Still, wonder if it would work

i think the way it works is if 4-6 negs come in it fails

the system should be


0-6 passes
7-9 passes unless admin says no
10-12 fails unless admin says yes
13-18 fails

thats a true democracy. not 6-7 neg happy people having a majority on the competition.

Have you been reading my PMs? Exactly what I put for Option E.

good to see we think alike. if 11/18 can vote to keep a trading system as 18 coaches voting and did that with a majority. then the voting system itself should be the same.

[DazBurg]

2012
130 total
9 failed
121 passed

2013
59 total
7 failed
52 passed

2014
152 total
22 failed
130 passed

2015
106 total
13 failed
93 pass

Total years combined
447 made
51 failed
396 passed

i still do not see the problem here that is a fairly decent amount of passed
if that isn't good enough then there is no point in voting at all

everyone that wants a different system due to trade fails keeps pointing to AFL clubs do not have a say in other clubs trades

but then again AFL clubs don't do nearly 450 trades in 4 seasons combined either

yes other comps do not have our trade vote most have either a commettie or an admin decide but they also have a cap on movements (some do i'm not sure if all do so bare with me here)

point being if your more restricted in your movements your more likely to do less trades meaning a lot less rejected meaning a lot less complaints