WXV Discussion

[Nails]

I'd say no snake if before trading period

but as some teams are significantly stronger - NYR for example and some significantly weaker - dildos

I think picking off ladder order would rek it.

[Holz]

Maybe average out the last 3 years positions.

so Dublin 18 + 9 + 1 so give me the 10th best pick.

seems fair.

[Justin Bieber]

Maybe average out the last 3 years positions.

so Dublin 18 + 9 + 1 so give me the 10th best pick.

seems fair.

Just let Ossie decide order if that, he can objectively look at the team lists and say which is weakest/strongest. Cause Dublin don't even need a pick ;).

[MajorLazer]

Yep. Like the idea of Os doing it.

[Nails]

Dublin get 0 picks but their trade with dildos gets put through.

[Holz]

Maybe average out the last 3 years positions.

so Dublin 18 + 9 + 1 so give me the 10th best pick.

seems fair.

Just let Ossie decide order if that, he can objectively look at the team lists and say which is weakest/strongest. Cause Dublin don't even need a pick ;).

what are you talking about I have Daniel Wells and DavidMundy on my interchange bench than nothing in the mids. I need Ablett.

[ossie85]

Nope just heard about pothead now!

Changes everything :/

I'd still want 18 teams... Think it works better. Thoughts from others?

[DazBurg]

Nope just heard about pothead now!

Changes everything :/

I'd still want 18 teams... Think it works better. Thoughts from others?

i personally like 18 as well it models on the AFL perfectly

and for equalization well as Holz just posted Dublin have gone 18th into 9th into premiers so shows it can be done imo

[ossie85]

How about the Rio de Janeiro Jaguars and Christchurch Saints pick squads from all the Sao Paulo and Wellington players?

And we just keep the rest as normal

[kilbluff1985]

How about the Rio de Janeiro Jaguars and Christchurch Saints pick squads from all the Sao Paulo and Wellington players?

And we just keep the rest as normal

with the ability to trade picks? :o ;)

you would obviously have to be strict approving trades like making sure they are getting Best XV players in return for early picks but gives coaches a chance to pick and choose the team more

[Purple 77]

How about the Rio de Janeiro Jaguars and Christchurch Saints pick squads from all the Sao Paulo and Wellington players?

And we just keep the rest as normal

This is what I would prefer personally. I think it appropriate to retire the Pumas and Weta Warriors as they have been coaches for 3 years, and create two new teams out of those players. 18 team model is what I would vote for.

[Torpedo10]

How about the Rio de Janeiro Jaguars and Christchurch Saints pick squads from all the Sao Paulo and Wellington players?

And we just keep the rest as normal

This is what I would prefer personally. I think it appropriate to retire the Pumas and Weta Warriors as they have been coaches for 3 years, and create two new teams out of those players. 18 team model is what I would vote for.

This might be the best option from here.

[ossie85]

Guys if anyone else is thinking of resigning, now'd be the time to do it

[Ricochet]

Would rather 18 but think 16 is better for more equal best 15s. Means the lesser teams field a 90-100+ player over a 50ave Player while the top teams may only gain 10-20pts

[Nige]

Would rather 18 but think 16 is better for more equal best 15s. Means the lesser teams field a 90-100+ player over a 50ave Player while the top teams may only gain 10-20pts

Totally agree. As far as equalisation the comp goes, 16 teams is better.

Although, this still doesn't help teams like Beijing who are still evidently struggling.