WXV Discussion

[Holz]

This ain't Euros.

No from me at this stage, but will have to discuss with my Co-Coach.

euro isnt doing it.

[Master Q]

This ain't Euros.

No from me at this stage, but will have to discuss with my Co-Coach.

euro isnt doing it.

Yeah, but Euros is based on the AF/DT game. This is SC.

[kilbluff1985]

i think Goddard will get M/F kinda think Watson might also

[ossie85]

Think it will be obvious ones like frawley to forward

[kilbluff1985]

Think it will be obvious ones like frawley to forward

Goddard been playing heaps forwards

Carlisle should be D/F maybe just a forward next year :(

[Nails]

I don't actually have my own team here but I'm opposed to it completely.

It is unfair on the teams that don't receive any changes that would help them. I'm sure many people would have traded differently if they knew these changes were coming. Pretty much like Ele said, any mid-season rule change is abit stupid IMO.

Don't make me smack you back into line Mr. Buenos Aires Assistant :P we're FOR this! lol

[nrich102]

I don't actually have my own team here but I'm opposed to it completely.

It is unfair on the teams that don't receive any changes that would help them. I'm sure many people would have traded differently if they knew these changes were coming. Pretty much like Ele said, any mid-season rule change is abit stupid IMO.

Don't make me smack you back into line Mr. Buenos Aires Assistant :P we're FOR this! lol

I like it to, can only favour us.

[JBs-Hawks]

^^And thats why it shouldnt be put to a vote.

Also to the people saying it only helps.

What if i am playing Nails and his d4 averages 70. James Kelly gets given DPP and brings his d4 up to a 95 average. Then nails beats me by 20 points? How the flower does this help me?

[Nails]

Some people say unfair because blah...

I'd say some coaches are suffering unfairly due to this rule not being in place. e.g. some people trading in players like *random name* James Kelly with expectations he'd play as a midfielder with midfielder output. But instead receive James Kelly defender and be stuck with him in mids.

but I'll leave out the point where Kelly is average more as a defender than last year as mid (if he was mid)

[Nige]

I don't actually have my own team here but I'm opposed to it completely.

It is unfair on the teams that don't receive any changes that would help them. I'm sure many people would have traded differently if they knew these changes were coming. Pretty much like Ele said, any mid-season rule change is abit stupid IMO.

Don't make me smack you back into line Mr. Buenos Aires Assistant :P we're FOR this! lol

Fire him.  :o

[Nails]

^^And thats why it shouldnt be put to a vote.

Also to the people saying it only helps.

What if i am playing Nails and his d4 averages 70. James Kelly gets given DPP and brings his d4 up to a 95 average. Then nails beats me by 20 points? How the flower does this help me?

oh jb plz, let's be serious? 20 point win against Seoul? No need to get silly here jb.

[JBs-Hawks]

^^And thats why it shouldnt be put to a vote.

Also to the people saying it only helps.

What if i am playing Nails and his d4 averages 70. James Kelly gets given DPP and brings his d4 up to a 95 average. Then nails beats me by 20 points? How the flower does this help me?

oh jb plz, let's be serious? 20 point win against Seoul? No need to get silly here jb.

Just hypotheticals :P

[DazBurg]

Some people say unfair because blah...

I'd say some coaches are suffering unfairly due to this rule not being in place. e.g. some people trading in players like *random name* James Kelly with expectations he'd play as a midfielder with midfielder output. But instead receive James Kelly defender and be stuck with him in mids.

but I'll leave out the point where Kelly is average more as a defender than last year as mid (if he was mid)

what is the difference to any other season that is the risk You as coach take no one forced you to do that trade

but weather it helps you or hinders you
same as us at PNL weather it helps or not
i still think SC Scoring SC positions
until SC change it we don't

[kilbluff1985]

I don't actually have my own team here but I'm opposed to it completely.

It is unfair on the teams that don't receive any changes that would help them. I'm sure many people would have traded differently if they knew these changes were coming. Pretty much like Ele said, any mid-season rule change is abit stupid IMO.

Don't make me smack you back into line Mr. Buenos Aires Assistant :P we're FOR this! lol

Fire him.  :o

fire Vinny lol

[Holz]

I don't actually have my own team here but I'm opposed to it completely.

It is unfair on the teams that don't receive any changes that would help them. I'm sure many people would have traded differently if they knew these changes were coming. Pretty much like Ele said, any mid-season rule change is abit stupid IMO.

Don't make me smack you back into line Mr. Buenos Aires Assistant :P we're FOR this! lol

A position always available at the destroyers if he wants to join the winning team.