WXV Discussion

[Nige]

Quit your talking and trade with me for flowers sake. :P

At the right price, anyone is available. Apart from Mitch Grigg ;D

It's impossible to trade with someone who is unwavering in their approach to trading. Plus, last time I tried, you didn't want any of the guns we were offering.  ::)

Well it's up to you. You tried to get Nicholls by giving up Lewis Stevenson hahahaha. No thanks.

Do you even remember why? Because you don't want anyone over like 24 or something... ??? There are certain players every club has that are off limits and you only seem to want those players from us. I could have made some really decent offers that most people would probably accept if you didn't have such a specific criteria. ::)

While we're talking about that... Apparently there are rumours about us possibly trading Beams.

BEAMS IS NOT FOR SALE.

[Jay]

Quit your talking and trade with me for flowers sake. :P

At the right price, anyone is available. Apart from Mitch Grigg ;D

It's impossible to trade with someone who is unwavering in their approach to trading. Plus, last time I tried, you didn't want any of the guns we were offering.  ::)

Well it's up to you. You tried to get Nicholls by giving up Lewis Stevenson hahahaha. No thanks.

Do you even remember why? Because you don't want anyone over like 24 or something... ??? There are certain players every club has that are off limits and you only seem to want those players from us. I could have made some really decent offers that most people would probably accept if you didn't have such a specific criteria. ::)

Thats not very specific criteria lol, also said 1st and 2nd rounders are good but you weren't keen on giving them up. Why would Pacific want old spuds?

[Nige]

Quit your talking and trade with me for flowers sake. :P

At the right price, anyone is available. Apart from Mitch Grigg ;D

It's impossible to trade with someone who is unwavering in their approach to trading. Plus, last time I tried, you didn't want any of the guns we were offering.  ::)

Well it's up to you. You tried to get Nicholls by giving up Lewis Stevenson hahahaha. No thanks.

Do you even remember why? Because you don't want anyone over like 24 or something... ??? There are certain players every club has that are off limits and you only seem to want those players from us. I could have made some really decent offers that most people would probably accept if you didn't have such a specific criteria. ::)

Thats not very specific criteria lol, also said 1st and 2nd rounders are good but you weren't keen on giving them up. Why would Pacific want old spuds?

Danny Stanley? An old spud at 25? Whatever you say.

[Jay]

Nicholls >>>>> Stanley

[Nige]

Nicholls >>>>> Stanley

Even though you have 4 rucks and arguably the worst backline in the competition, sure.  ::)

[AFEV]

Nicholls >>>>> Stanley

Even though you have 4 rucks and arguably the worst backline in the competition, sure.  ::)

Just because they have a surplus of rucks, it doesn't mean they should trade them for unders. :-X

[Jay]

Nicholls >>>>> Stanley

Even though you have 4 rucks and arguably the worst backline in the competition, sure.  ::)

Just because they have a surplus of rucks, it doesn't mean they should trade them for unders. :-X

Sid knows where its at.

[AFEV]

Nicholls >>>>> Stanley

Even though you have 4 rucks and arguably the worst backline in the competition, sure.  ::)

Just because they have a surplus of rucks, it doesn't mean they should trade them for unders. :-X

Sid knows where its at.

[Master Q]

Yeah but rather trade a ruck for unders (at least it's something) than have 4 and just waste 2  :P

[Nige]

Yeah but rather trade a ruck for unders (at least it's something) than have 4 and just waste 2  :P

This. Especially when 3 are young guns and Leuey is just a tad older and can serve their club for years...

[DazBurg]

Yeah but rather trade a ruck for unders (at least it's something) than have 4 and just waste 2  :P

This. Especially when 3 are young guns and Leuey is just a tad older and can serve their club for years...

but maybe someone is offering a better deal?
or maybe he has a thought of which 2 of 4 he'd like to keep and maybe his 1 of them?
or basically maybe he just will not be screwed over for trading's sake
if they waste better to keep and next year all monster it and then get more for them then trade for unders

[Master Q]

Yeah but rather trade a ruck for unders (at least it's something) than have 4 and just waste 2  :P

This. Especially when 3 are young guns and Leuey is just a tad older and can serve their club for years...

but maybe someone is offering a better deal?
or maybe he has a thought of which 2 of 4 he'd like to keep and maybe his 1 of them?
or basically maybe he just will not be screwed over for trading's sake
if they waste better to keep and next year all monster it and then get more for them then trade for unders

And what if none of them monster it and there value goes down considering it and they are a year older?

[AFEV]

Yeah but rather trade a ruck for unders (at least it's something) than have 4 and just waste 2  :P

This. Especially when 3 are young guns and Leuey is just a tad older and can serve their club for years...

but maybe someone is offering a better deal?
or maybe he has a thought of which 2 of 4 he'd like to keep and maybe his 1 of them?
or basically maybe he just will not be screwed over for trading's sake
if they waste better to keep and next year all monster it and then get more for them then trade for unders

And what if none of them monster it and there value goes down considering it and they are a year older?

Then they will probably get the same value they would have if they had taken an unders offer this off-season...

[DazBurg]

Yeah but rather trade a ruck for unders (at least it's something) than have 4 and just waste 2  :P

This. Especially when 3 are young guns and Leuey is just a tad older and can serve their club for years...

but maybe someone is offering a better deal?
or maybe he has a thought of which 2 of 4 he'd like to keep and maybe his 1 of them?
or basically maybe he just will not be screwed over for trading's sake
if they waste better to keep and next year all monster it and then get more for them then trade for unders

And what if none of them monster it and there value goes down considering it and they are a year older?

Then they will probably get the same value they would have if they had taken an unders offer this off-season...

exactly  ;)

[Maca24]

How goods our rookie list!?
B.Jack, T.Curren, M.Blicavs and D.Butcher!