SC 2014 Profile: Sam Reid

[theta]

Tabs I'm sensing a pattern of inflated predictions on your Sydney players lol

Yeah haha. Craig Bird, Tom Mitchell, Rohan, Parker all 90 average aswell as Reid. Jack at 120. Hanners 110.

Come on mate, great profiles but settle on the bias ;)

So you dont think that Titch or Parker can average 90??

Bird IMO will move further fwd this year and will snag a few goals and scored a high of 138 in 2013. Average of 72 which included 3 games in the green vest.

Jack had an average of 109 in 2013 with a high of 146.

Dan Han increased his average by 13 points to 95, who is to say that he cant do the same in 2014?

Parker increase his average by 15 and can easily step up again.

Titch averged 85 with one game in a green vest and another when he went off before HT

I little optimistic, but not as far fetched as some might think.

That said, who in your book is going to lose value tabs?

[Vinny]

Tabs I'm sensing a pattern of inflated predictions on your Sydney players lol

Yeah haha. Craig Bird, Tom Mitchell, Rohan, Parker all 90 average aswell as Reid. Jack at 120. Hanners 110.

Come on mate, great profiles but settle on the bias ;)

So you dont think that Titch or Parker can average 90??

Bird IMO will move further fwd this year and will snag a few goals and scored a high of 138 in 2013. Average of 72 which included 3 games in the green vest.

Jack had an average of 109 in 2013 with a high of 146.

Dan Han increased his average by 13 points to 95, who is to say that he cant do the same in 2014?

Parker increase his average by 15 and can easily step up again.

Titch averged 85 with one game in a green vest and another when he went off before HT

One of Titch and Parker might, my money would be on Parker.

There is no way all the Sydney players can average this well.

If Hanners, JPK & Jack all were to go 110+ they should be in your team.

It's just not realistic IMO. Jack is a freak and I rate him but he struggled with the tag during certain games, who is to say he won't get it again?

No way we will all of those blokes go that high. Maybe a few but not that many.

[theta]

My tips...

B - Smith (65), Richards (70), Johnson (60)
HB - Shaw (60), Grundy (65), McVeigh (100)
C - Parker (90), ROK (100), Hannebery (100)
HF - Jetta (70), Franklin (105), Rohan (70)
F - Goodes (90), Tippett (100), McGlynn (75)
Fol - Pyke(90), K.Jack (112), JPK (115)
Int - Malceski (85), Reid (70), T.Mitchell (95), Bird (70)

[Vinny]

I think they are far more realistic.

Only changes I would make are that one of JPK and Jack will kill it and the other one will struggle a little bit, but my struggle I mean 95-105ish.

Goodes probably 85 and Parker to go 93 and Mitchell 84.

I think the Pyke is a good call but I think he will go 95.

Bird might push 80. But one of Parker Bird Mitchell will do worse than expected.

Swap Tippett and Buddy around.

Just my predictions.

[dmac07]

B - Smith (70), Richards (70), Johnson (60)   
HB - Shaw (60), Grundy (70), McVeigh (100) 
C - Parker (90), ROK (110), Hannebery (110)
HF - Jetta (80), Franklin (95), Rohan (90)
F - Goodes (90), Tippett (110), McGlynn (75)
Fol - Pyke(90), K.Jack (120), JPK (110)
Int - Malceski (100), Reid (90), T.Mitchell (90), Bird (90) 

umm no

HEY!! - Back off the Tabs!

Last years avg as per below

B - Smith (66), Richards (69), Johnson (0) (64 in 2012)
HB - Shaw (62), Grundy (64), McVeigh (106) 
C - Parker (87), ROK (101), Hannebery (95)
HF - Jetta (62), Franklin (90), Rohan (32)
F - Goodes (84), Tippett (90), McGlynn (72)
Fol - Pyke(87), K.Jack (109), JPK (105)
Int - Malceski (91), Reid (58), T.Mitchell (86), Bird (73)

The only guys who Tabs has predicted to increase significantly

Rohan - Avg Last year 32 based on 3 games (1 sub) after long term injury - 90 Might be a stretch, but certainly will get up to 75+
Hannebery - a 15 point increase is a big jump, but not unrealistic. Played a couple of role games later in the season that effected his yearly avg. But pre bye last year he was at a 103 avg.
Tippett - a 20 point increase as the main focal point getting the 2nd or 3rd best defender is a good chance
Reid - If he plays in the Fwd Line like we expect, he will get the 4th defender instead of the 1st or 2nd he is used to. He is a good chance to dominate contested marks. 90 might be high but 80-85 is very real.

The others like Parker, Mitchell and Bird just need to hold this years avg without getting vested and they will reach Tabs picks.

Cant bash against a little bias as im bias towards my team, though not in the profiles im doing for them.

But by those ststs, counting out johnson who didnt play, and rohan whos average of 32 doesnt reflect much, 16 players increasing average by a total of 166 points, 3 players decreasing average, by a total of 11 points. Thats still an extra 155 points a game  ::)

[theta]

No to Reid. 

65-70 if he stays forward.

70-75 if he drops back.

[Capper]

Tabs I'm sensing a pattern of inflated predictions on your Sydney players lol

Yeah haha. Craig Bird, Tom Mitchell, Rohan, Parker all 90 average aswell as Reid. Jack at 120. Hanners 110.

Come on mate, great profiles but settle on the bias ;)

So you dont think that Titch or Parker can average 90??

Bird IMO will move further fwd this year and will snag a few goals and scored a high of 138 in 2013. Average of 72 which included 3 games in the green vest.

Jack had an average of 109 in 2013 with a high of 146.

Dan Han increased his average by 13 points to 95, who is to say that he cant do the same in 2014?

Parker increase his average by 15 and can easily step up again.

Titch averged 85 with one game in a green vest and another when he went off before HT

I little optimistic, but not as far fetched as some might think.

That said, who in your book is going to lose value tabs?

anyone who gets either vest will lose value and knowing the swans it could be anyone. Both the Green and Red vest were past around the team last year.

All averages that I suggest are non-sub affected averages

[SydneyRox]

B - Smith (70), Richards (70), Johnson (60)   
HB - Shaw (60), Grundy (70), McVeigh (100) 
C - Parker (90), ROK (110), Hannebery (110)
HF - Jetta (80), Franklin (95), Rohan (90)
F - Goodes (90), Tippett (110), McGlynn (75)
Fol - Pyke(90), K.Jack (120), JPK (110)
Int - Malceski (100), Reid (90), T.Mitchell (90), Bird (90) 

umm no

HEY!! - Back off the Tabs!

Last years avg as per below

B - Smith (66), Richards (69), Johnson (0) (64 in 2012)
HB - Shaw (62), Grundy (64), McVeigh (106) 
C - Parker (87), ROK (101), Hannebery (95)
HF - Jetta (62), Franklin (90), Rohan (32)
F - Goodes (84), Tippett (90), McGlynn (72)
Fol - Pyke(87), K.Jack (109), JPK (105)
Int - Malceski (91), Reid (58), T.Mitchell (86), Bird (73)

The only guys who Tabs has predicted to increase significantly

Rohan - Avg Last year 32 based on 3 games (1 sub) after long term injury - 90 Might be a stretch, but certainly will get up to 75+
Hannebery - a 15 point increase is a big jump, but not unrealistic. Played a couple of role games later in the season that effected his yearly avg. But pre bye last year he was at a 103 avg.
Tippett - a 20 point increase as the main focal point getting the 2nd or 3rd best defender is a good chance
Reid - If he plays in the Fwd Line like we expect, he will get the 4th defender instead of the 1st or 2nd he is used to. He is a good chance to dominate contested marks. 90 might be high but 80-85 is very real.

The others like Parker, Mitchell and Bird just need to hold this years avg without getting vested and they will reach Tabs picks.

Cant bash against a little bias as im bias towards my team, though not in the profiles im doing for them.

But by those ststs, counting out johnson who didnt play, and rohan whos average of 32 doesnt reflect much, 16 players increasing average by a total of 166 points, 3 players decreasing average, by a total of 11 points. Thats still an extra 155 points a game  ::)

Champion data says they are the best team in the league!

[CrowsFan]

B - Smith (70), Richards (70), Johnson (60)   
HB - Shaw (60), Grundy (70), McVeigh (100) 
C - Parker (90), ROK (110), Hannebery (110)
HF - Jetta (80), Franklin (95), Rohan (90)
F - Goodes (90), Tippett (110), McGlynn (75)
Fol - Pyke(90), K.Jack (120), JPK (110)
Int - Malceski (100), Reid (90), T.Mitchell (90), Bird (90) 

umm no

HEY!! - Back off the Tabs!

Last years avg as per below

B - Smith (66), Richards (69), Johnson (0) (64 in 2012)
HB - Shaw (62), Grundy (64), McVeigh (106) 
C - Parker (87), ROK (101), Hannebery (95)
HF - Jetta (62), Franklin (90), Rohan (32)
F - Goodes (84), Tippett (90), McGlynn (72)
Fol - Pyke(87), K.Jack (109), JPK (105)
Int - Malceski (91), Reid (58), T.Mitchell (86), Bird (73)

The only guys who Tabs has predicted to increase significantly

Rohan - Avg Last year 32 based on 3 games (1 sub) after long term injury - 90 Might be a stretch, but certainly will get up to 75+
Hannebery - a 15 point increase is a big jump, but not unrealistic. Played a couple of role games later in the season that effected his yearly avg. But pre bye last year he was at a 103 avg.
Tippett - a 20 point increase as the main focal point getting the 2nd or 3rd best defender is a good chance
Reid - If he plays in the Fwd Line like we expect, he will get the 4th defender instead of the 1st or 2nd he is used to. He is a good chance to dominate contested marks. 90 might be high but 80-85 is very real.

The others like Parker, Mitchell and Bird just need to hold this years avg without getting vested and they will reach Tabs picks.

Cant bash against a little bias as im bias towards my team, though not in the profiles im doing for them.

But by those ststs, counting out johnson who didnt play, and rohan whos average of 32 doesnt reflect much, 16 players increasing average by a total of 166 points, 3 players decreasing average, by a total of 11 points. Thats still an extra 155 points a game  ::)

Champion data says they are the best team in the league!

Where did you get that info? This article from 2 weeks ago says Hawks is the best team in the league...
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/champion-data-list-analysis-has-reigning-afl-premiers-hawthorn-ahead-of-the-pack/story-fni5f8ge-1226777876749

[SydneyRox]

This one, wasnt Champion data exactly, but the AFL player rankings and this one was also talking only about the starting22

Havent read the prospectus one yet. Bugger of a thing only turned up yesterday

Here is article

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-12-02/points-taken-swans-on-top

[Vinny]

Dudeeee AFL player rankings are a joke..

[eaglesman]

cant believe that there has been 26 now 27 comments on this thread

the bloke is fantasy irrelevant ... pick him if u wanna be ranked say 10 000

[SydneyRox]

cant believe that there has been 26 now 27 comments on this thread

the bloke is fantasy irrelevant ... pick him if u wanna be ranked say 10 000

Cant believe you went to the trouble of counting the posts.....

you cant have read them, cos not too many are actually about Reid....