Jack Watts

Started by shorty3264, December 11, 2013, 06:07:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

C.Judd3Votes

Keen for the beard to he unleashed.

eaglesman

Just when I thought my def and fwd was settled ... He teases me with every possession ... Watts v grimes

DC13

based on the final SC scores by foxfooty match centre, watts scored 47 and grimes scored 56 so watts must have been pretty inefficient considering he had 22 possessions.

eaglesman

Quote from: DC13 on February 28, 2014, 10:03:11 PM
based on the final SC scores by foxfooty match centre, watts scored 47 and grimes scored 56 so watts must have been pretty inefficient considering he had 22 possessions.

his game is largely uncontested too

Grufflez

Why even make a thread on watts? i have never considered him even once in the last few years..#1 draft pick counts for nought at afl level..you have to apply yourself.

shaker

Don't know what to make of that performance probably that he is still the same , hard to judge  ???

eaglesman

what i made of it was melbourne liked to get the ball in his hands particularly early ... certainly looks comfortable as a midfielder but its just a bunch of uncontested possessions

auscoyote

I just cant bring myself to trust him enough for a spot in my team. Will be serviceable for melb and should improve under roos but think there is better options out there.

ubeaut

He doesn't like contested footy or tackling. He'll get heaps of pill but 90 is the very highest he'll go more like 80-85. He just bugs me watching him play. Rather Swallow for not much more.

Big Mac

Quote from: ubeaut on March 02, 2014, 08:07:55 PM
He doesn't like contested footy or tackling. He'll get heaps of pill but 90 is the very highest he'll go more like 80-85. He just bugs me watching him play. Rather Swallow for not much more.

Very frustrating as a Melbourne supporter seeing him get 0 tackles every third game