GoLions16's SC Diary 2014

Started by GoLions, October 31, 2013, 12:15:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

benharris222

Quote from: GoLions16 on May 28, 2014, 03:30:41 PM
Hmm, I could instead bring in Goddard instead of Jaensch. Would complete my mids, and I'd still have KK at D6 and can maybe bring in Bartel in a few weeks time or something. Thoughts?

I like the sound of this trading plan :). Moving Hanley back into defence? :)

GoLions

Quote from: benharris222 on May 28, 2014, 03:34:47 PM
Quote from: GoLions16 on May 28, 2014, 03:30:41 PM
Hmm, I could instead bring in Goddard instead of Jaensch. Would complete my mids, and I'd still have KK at D6 and can maybe bring in Bartel in a few weeks time or something. Thoughts?

I like the sound of this trading plan :). Moving Hanley back into defence? :)
Yeah, Hanley would be back in defence if I got Goddard

benharris222

Quote from: GoLions16 on May 28, 2014, 03:36:55 PM
Quote from: benharris222 on May 28, 2014, 03:34:47 PM
Quote from: GoLions16 on May 28, 2014, 03:30:41 PM
Hmm, I could instead bring in Goddard instead of Jaensch. Would complete my mids, and I'd still have KK at D6 and can maybe bring in Bartel in a few weeks time or something. Thoughts?

I like the sound of this trading plan :). Moving Hanley back into defence? :)
Yeah, Hanley would be back in defence if I got Goddard

I like the look of that trade then :).

Vinny

Yep get Goddard man, KK is in some good form so I'd much rather him on the field at D6 for now and a premium averaging 117.

GoLions

Yeah that's pretty much what I was thinking. It's pretty much Goddard vs Jaensch + 100k, and I definitely prefer Goddard there

GoLions

Is it too rage-trady to offload jjk and roughy to lecca and zorko? I'm fed up with both of them.

Vinny


Ringo

Surprised you did not keep the faith with Zorks GL. I would get rid of Roughy though as he will not score big at all as he will always get No 1 defender whereas JJK can throw in the big game.

GoLions

Quote from: Ringo on June 02, 2014, 01:49:42 PM
Surprised you did not keep the faith with Zorks GL. I would get rid of Roughy though as he will not score big at all as he will always get No 1 defender whereas JJK can throw in the big game.
I never had Zorko haha, started with all of these forwards, and really want to bring him in this week as he is at his cheapest just about and our draw opens up now.
JJK has just been so disappointing. Last year he was getting a lot more possessions each game, often around 13-20 or thereabouts. This season he struggles to get 10.

I just really want to cut my losses with both of them tbh.

Mat0369

Roughy will pump out a  140 in the next couple of games, JJ doesn't look like getting near it.

GoLions

Is it worth getting Tex over Lecca this week, which would mean next week I could easily do KK-->Bartel? There's a good chance though that Tex may remain as F6 at least until finals, which I'm not too sure on...

AaronKirk

Will you just cut your losses with JJK now he is out this weekend?

If you go JJK --> Tex can you still afford KK --> Bartel?


GoLions

Quote from: AaronKirk on June 03, 2014, 06:27:35 PM
Will you just cut your losses with JJK now he is out this weekend?

If you go JJK --> Tex can you still afford KK --> Bartel?
Nah, about 40k short.
I've locked in JJK-->Zorko this week, so it's just whether I keep Roughy or not.
I could offload Langford to Litherland instead of Roughy to Lecca/Tex, but don't know what Litherland's JS is like

Mat0369

Poor. I thought he would have come in a couple of weeks back when the Hawks lost Gibbo, but they seem content to role with Stratton, Shoenmakers and Cheney/Hodge/Birch taking the other tall

GoLions

Reversed the Roughy trade 8)