Main Menu

Big Mummy to be a Giant.

Started by Nige, October 02, 2013, 04:30:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Vinny

Hmm he will be priced on an average of 88. 470k based on this years magic number.

Finished the year with: 89,95,77,123,113,111,102,91,159. So he is a very capable scorer.

Not for me but one to look at.

JBs-Hawks

Quote from: NigeyS on October 02, 2013, 07:55:34 PM
I just realised this will be Mummy's third club.  :o

Just follows the $$$

BB67th

Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 02, 2013, 08:36:10 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on October 02, 2013, 07:55:34 PM
I just realised this will be Mummy's third club.  :o

Just follows the $$$
To be fair, he didn't get a good run at the Cats, and maybe he feels Buddy creates an abundance of talls and no room for him? Still, he is getting paid quite a lot at the Giants for the player he is, so can you really blame him?

My Chumps

Quote from: vinny on October 02, 2013, 08:00:18 PM
Hmm he will be priced on an average of 88. 470k based on this years magic number.

Finished the year with: 89,95,77,123,113,111,102,91,159. So he is a very capable scorer.

Not for me but one to look at.
Always been a quality scorer, it's just about staying on the pitch for the big fella.

Nige

Shane Mumford has officially been traded to the Giants in exchange for the Giants third round pick - #35.

SydneyRox

not all bad, should have got more, is a better player than Hampson @ 28

But could have gone to GWS in PS

Jroo

Quote from: SydneyRox on October 18, 2013, 05:23:37 PM
not all bad, should have got more, is a better player than Hampson @ 28

But could have gone to GWS in PS
Yeah he is obviously worth more than that, but as you said he could've walked for nothing so I think it's a fair trade. As a Swan supporter I'd be happy getting pick 35 for Mumford, as it's better than nothing.

Capper

Quote from: JROO8 on October 18, 2013, 05:29:00 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on October 18, 2013, 05:23:37 PM
not all bad, should have got more, is a better player than Hampson @ 28

But could have gone to GWS in PS
Yeah he is obviously worth more than that, but as you said he could've walked for nothing so I think it's a fair trade. As a Swan supporter I'd be happy getting pick 35 for Mumford, as it's better than nothing.
Would have liked a higher pick but its better than nothing. We would have got worse if he left as a free agent

Ziplock

Quote from: tabs on October 18, 2013, 07:01:24 PM
Quote from: JROO8 on October 18, 2013, 05:29:00 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on October 18, 2013, 05:23:37 PM
not all bad, should have got more, is a better player than Hampson @ 28

But could have gone to GWS in PS
Yeah he is obviously worth more than that, but as you said he could've walked for nothing so I think it's a fair trade. As a Swan supporter I'd be happy getting pick 35 for Mumford, as it's better than nothing.
Would have liked a higher pick but its better than nothing. We would have got worse if he left as a free agent

he wasnt a free agent, he was just going to walk into the psd... so you would have gotten  nothing at all :P