Main Menu

ossie85's Top 50 players of 2013

Started by ossie85, September 19, 2013, 03:30:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ringo

Well done Ossie.  Nice list and great to see Patful getting some recognition for his consistency. Agree with Noz in that I would have Libba a lot higher than 50 given the season he has had.

tor01doc

I too shuddered @ 38 - but give him his due


And his runners up medal.  :P

My Chumps

#47
Good list except no Bartel is absolutely ridiculous :P

Jroo

Nice work ossie, looks pretty good, I've done mine and hopefully I'll release it later today. I know it isn't easy putting these together but you've done a good job. 

ossie85


Quote from: JROO8 on October 02, 2013, 12:10:06 PM
Nice work ossie, looks pretty good, I've done mine and hopefully I'll release it later today. I know it isn't easy putting these together but you've done a good job. 

Look forward to it :)

Quote from: My Chumps on October 02, 2013, 12:08:07 PM
Good list except no Bartel is absolutely ridiculous :P

Yeah, he was in the 51-55 range for sure! He was fantastic fantasy wise.... was tough to leave out.

Quote from: Ringo on September 30, 2013, 08:39:51 AM
Agree with Noz in that I would have Libba a lot higher than 50 given the season he has had.

Yeah, he was really good... but wasn't good enough for All-Aus nomination.... Doggy fans should be happy, I had 4 of them in it :)

Quote from: CrowsFan on September 30, 2013, 12:13:20 AM
Only change I would have would be having Sloane in the list ahead of Douglas.

Another tough choice! So many midfielders, so little positions!

Quote from: Ziplock on September 29, 2013, 11:44:32 PM
cameron :(

I thought there would be an uproar about him missing out, but only Zip noticed. The guy had a great season, but only in goals, his other stats were well down on other key forwards. Only 2nd season!

Quote from: Mailman the 2nd on September 29, 2013, 01:25:50 PM
Solid list you have there, I especially like the added attention to non-midfielder positions.

I'd probably have Pyke over Cox, but that's me being biased

I'm a huge fan of Cox (lol), and he was vastly underrated this year. Only fitted in the 3 rucks this year, which was unusual. So Pyke is unlucky


My Chumps

Quote from: ossie85 on October 02, 2013, 01:06:23 PM
Quote from: My Chumps on October 02, 2013, 12:08:07 PM
Good list except no Bartel is absolutely ridiculous :P

Yeah, he was in the 51-55 range for sure! He was fantastic fantasy wise.... was tough to leave out.
Like I understand that you want to highlight underrated players in this list Oss, but to have Patful over Bartel is basically blasphemy :P

What has he shown this year that Bartel hasn't?

My Chumps

And no JPK is... interesting. I know he had a poorer season by his standards but he still averaged 27 disposals.

Jroo

Quote from: ossie85 on October 02, 2013, 01:06:23 PM

Quote from: JROO8 on October 02, 2013, 12:10:06 PM
Nice work ossie, looks pretty good, I've done mine and hopefully I'll release it later today. I know it isn't easy putting these together but you've done a good job. 

Look forward to it :)
Here it is finally, ossie!
Yours looked pretty good, I wonder what FanFooty will think of mine!

Ziplock

well, you did a flowering better job rating players  than this guy did

https://www.facebook.com/AFLSeasonInfo?ref=stream&hc_location=stream

he tried to rate the top 5 players at each club (in no order).... he basically was just naming the club's top 5 mids.

left cameron out of gws's top 5... shower like that. 

Jroo

Quote from: Ziplock on October 20, 2013, 07:32:35 PM
well, you did a flowering better job rating players  than this guy did

https://www.facebook.com/AFLSeasonInfo?ref=stream&hc_location=stream

he tried to rate the top 5 players at each club (in no order).... he basically was just naming the club's top 5 mids.

left cameron out of gws's top 5... shower like that.
Lol, that's terrible. Didn't even have Roughead in the Hawks' top 5. What a spud.

Mailman the 2nd

There could be a distinguishing point between a side's "best" players and a side's "most needed"

That said, that guy just named the starting midfields

Vinny

Hahaha what a spastic!

What about the second top comment for the Saints one ! ;D

Ziplock

Quote from: Mailman the 2nd on October 20, 2013, 07:39:39 PM
There could be a distinguishing point between a side's "best" players and a side's "most needed"

That said, that guy just named the starting midfields

the coleman medalist should be named in their clubs top 5 side... :P

JBs-Hawks

Quote from: Ziplock on October 20, 2013, 09:28:16 PM
Quote from: Mailman the 2nd on October 20, 2013, 07:39:39 PM
There could be a distinguishing point between a side's "best" players and a side's "most needed"

That said, that guy just named the starting midfields

the coleman medalist should be named in their clubs top 5 side... :P

Seeing as he is named in alot of peoples top 5 overall in the AFL :P

Mailman the 2nd

Quote from: Ziplock on October 20, 2013, 09:28:16 PM
Quote from: Mailman the 2nd on October 20, 2013, 07:39:39 PM
There could be a distinguishing point between a side's "best" players and a side's "most needed"

That said, that guy just named the starting midfields

the coleman medalist should be named in their clubs top 5 side... :P


Most people know the top 5 players of all the 17 opposition clubs that making lists is kind of pointless in the first place :P