Essendon Off Season Updates and Discussion Thread

Started by specky92, September 17, 2013, 02:39:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Nige


Jukes

Think you guys are underestimating how good Crameri is. And how shower the dogs' forward line is.

Mailman the 2nd

Quote from: Jukes on October 02, 2013, 09:36:13 PM
Think you guys are underestimating how good Crameri is. And how shower the dogs' forward line is.

Crameri is barely worth a top 30 pick, let alone 22 and another player

Nige

Quote from: Mailman the 2nd on October 02, 2013, 10:10:36 PM
Quote from: Jukes on October 02, 2013, 09:36:13 PM
Think you guys are underestimating how good Crameri is. And how shower the dogs' forward line is.

Crameri is barely worth a top 30 pick, let alone 22 and another player
Yeah, he's not that great to be worth JJ and a pick in the 20s.

silloc


specky92

Don't know why we'd want Johannisen unless we develop him into the speedy mid or crumbling forward pocket we need, :/

silloc

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-10-07/myers-not-for-sale

Good, after all the effort we've put into him, i'd hate to see him have another break out year somewhere else.

honestly i'd prefer us to stay quiet during the draft

tbagrocks


PICCOLLO

The likely prospect of losing Gumby and Crameri means Ess need to nab Heath Shaw or Chappy me thinks.  I'd much prefer to see Crameri stay tbh. Injury prone but a gun.

specky92

Quote from: PICCOLLO on October 07, 2013, 06:10:52 PM
The likely prospect of losing Gumby and Crameri means Ess need to nab Heath Shaw or Chappy me thinks.  I'd much prefer to see Crameri stay tbh. Injury prone but a gun.
crammers isn't exactly injury prone, never played under 16 games when in our best 22, I'd love chappy, I reckon he'd give us a real crack at the top 4

kilbluff1985

Quote from: PICCOLLO on October 07, 2013, 06:10:52 PM
The likely prospect of losing Gumby and Crameri means Ess need to nab Heath Shaw or Chappy me thinks.  I'd much prefer to see Crameri stay tbh. Injury prone but a gun.

so losing 2 forwards means we need to get a defender? don't see how that works :o

T Dog

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 07, 2013, 06:19:42 PM
Quote from: PICCOLLO on October 07, 2013, 06:10:52 PM
The likely prospect of losing Gumby and Crameri means Ess need to nab Heath Shaw or Chappy me thinks.  I'd much prefer to see Crameri stay tbh. Injury prone but a gun.

so losing 2 forwards means we need to get a defender? don't see how that works :o

Its obvious..Didak and Pods... ;D

kilbluff1985

nah with Crameri gone we can play Joe, Belly and Ryder and not be to tall

i don't want Didak will just stop Merrett, O'Brien, Kavanagh, Dell' Olio getting games and developing into good players

silloc

yeah, we can play both ruckman without having to flip a coin, and with joe - hurley combo. I've said it multiple times i'd also like to see hardingham spend some time up forward. So we could easily get rid of 2 key forwards and get a shaw type player. hibo could slot into the midfield like nothing.

edit: Hardingham could play pretty well as a defensive forward, can contest packs with his leap, whilst still being small and fast enough to crumb, his one weakness (disposal) isn't as crucial in attack.

Nige

@FoxFootyAnalyst
Since 2006 all clubs have made 9+ trades, except Essendon who have made 6. Same story every year, notoriously bad to deal with.

#LOLBombers