Main Menu

Tribunal

Started by Cicjose, September 09, 2013, 03:14:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cicjose

http://www.fremantlefc.com.au/news/2013-09-09/dawson-and-mayne-free-to-play

The report laid against Dawson for striking Podsiadly was thrown out after the panel decided he had "used an open hand in his action and that the contact was below that required to constitute a reportable offence".

The final quarter incident in which Dawson jumped in the air and clattered into Geelong skipper Joel Selwood was also looked at, but the panel found that Dawson was making a reasonable attempt to smother Selwood's handball.

Chris Mayne can accept a reprimand for a second-quarter incident involving Steve Johnson.

Mayne's contact with Johnson was graded as intentional, low impact and body contact which is 125 points or 93.75 with an early plea, leaving him free to play against either Sydney or Carlton in the preliminary final.

Nige

I reckon Dawson should have got a week, just because.  :P

Ringo

The MRP are being consistently inconsistent again compared to other incidents just like this which have received a match.

j959

yep, true to form but honestly there was nothing in any of the incidents so if they had 'picked and chosen' specific incidents that would've been another 'joke'.  ;)

i thought it was ironic with Stevie J apparently indicating to Mayne that he was gonna get 2wks or something like that - obviously as a serial offender himself he has a good idea!   ;)

valkorum

Good result from the tribunal - None of Dawsons "incidents" deserved a suspension.  I am glad that they picked up Corey Enright whacking Mayne (which is why Mayne whacked SJ)

Cicjose


valkorum


fidou

I'm sure Dawson is a shower golfer with those air swings.

valkorum

Quote from: fidou on September 09, 2013, 06:54:02 PM
I'm sure Dawson is a shower golfer with those air swings.

Exactly, but he is a damn good full back under the Ross Lyon game plan

Dudge

If it was Cornes or Hammer, they would of got 6  ;)

Ziplock

that was soft of SJ.

haha, imagine if it had been JZ

#6weeks

Vinny

Quote from: Ziplock on September 09, 2013, 09:00:14 PM
haha, imagine if it had been JZ

#6weeks

Hahaha so true! ;D

Poor Ziebell.

jamfrank

Must admit, a lot of similarities between Zac's incident and Ziebell's. Both left the ground, both made high contact, I thought Ziebell was making just as legitimate an attempt to get/smother the ball as Dawson. Very surprised Dawson didn't cop any weeks.

Ziplock

Quote from: jamfrank on September 09, 2013, 09:35:49 PM
Must admit, a lot of similarities between Zac's incident and Ziebell's. Both left the ground, both made high contact, I thought Ziebell was making just as legitimate an attempt to get/smother the ball as Dawson. Very surprised Dawson didn't cop any weeks.

I was just talking shower when I said JZ, but just looked at the footage...

I have no idea how dawson got off when jz didn't... like ziebell actually made contact with the footy, and juggled it before dropping the mark from memory :S

that was really clumsy by dawson lol. If it hadn't been in finals, he probs would have copped a couple.

Bill Manspeaker

Quote from: jamfrank on September 09, 2013, 09:35:49 PM
Must admit, a lot of similarities between Zac's incident and Ziebell's. Both left the ground, both made high contact, I thought Ziebell was making just as legitimate an attempt to get/smother the ball as Dawson. Very surprised Dawson didn't cop any weeks.

the only reason Ziebell got suspended is because his name is Jack Ziebell and the AFL doesn't like him for some reason. Zac shouldn't have got weeks, neither should have Ziebs