2013/14 LISTED TRADES

[Nige]

K, so no Gibson, JJ or Mohr.

Yep, my defense is flowered.

[SydneyRox]

Sorry guys but I am sticking to my rulings on this one.

We listed additional movements based on a new scoring scheme so as we are reverting back to the original status quo do not see the need for extra movements.  That is one of the reasons for all trades top be cancelled.

If coaches used all their movements as they were warned early then they now have to live by the decision to use all their 10 trades.

My decision is now based on the fact that there will now be no change to our competition so the rules that applied should now continue and that solely is my reason for the rulings.

@Kilbluff if you and memph wish to continue this trade please advise here.

You talking about Rusty and my trade or to KB?

[Nige]

Sorry guys but I am sticking to my rulings on this one.

We listed additional movements based on a new scoring scheme so as we are reverting back to the original status quo do not see the need for extra movements.  That is one of the reasons for all trades top be cancelled.

If coaches used all their movements as they were warned early then they now have to live by the decision to use all their 10 trades.

My decision is now based on the fact that there will now be no change to our competition so the rules that applied should now continue and that solely is my reason for the rulings.

@Kilbluff if you and memph wish to continue this trade please advise here.

You talking about Rusty and my trade or to KB?

To KB. You guys are fine.

[SydneyRox]

i thought so, but since it was posted directly after ours i wanted to check.

[Nige]

i thought so, but since it was posted directly after ours i wanted to check.

There's so much confusion, I don't blame you.

[elephants]

i thought so, but since it was posted directly after ours i wanted to check.

There's so much confusion, I don't blame you.

Let's not complain about it, let's try and help each other through it.

[Nige]

i thought so, but since it was posted directly after ours i wanted to check.

There's so much confusion, I don't blame you.

Let's not complain about it, let's try and help each other through it.

I'm not complaining? ???

Simply stated there was a bit of confusion.

I can't be helped in any way, shape or form because I've used all my permitted movements as I didn't foresee losing so many numbers in defense and gaining as many mids .

[elephants]

i thought so, but since it was posted directly after ours i wanted to check.

There's so much confusion, I don't blame you.

Let's not complain about it, let's try and help each other through it.

I'm not complaining? ???

Simply stated there was a bit of confusion.

I can't be helped in any way, shape or form because I've used all my permitted movements as I didn't foresee losing so many numbers in defense and gaining as many mids .

Never said you did, just stated that we shouldn't be and instead put our energies into helping out Ringo in this tough time for the comp.

[Nige]

i thought so, but since it was posted directly after ours i wanted to check.

There's so much confusion, I don't blame you.

Let's not complain about it, let's try and help each other through it.

I'm not complaining? ???

Simply stated there was a bit of confusion.

I can't be helped in any way, shape or form because I've used all my permitted movements as I didn't foresee losing so many numbers in defense and gaining as many mids .

Never said you did, just stated that we shouldn't be and instead put our energies into helping out Ringo in this tough time for the comp.

Ah, a misunderstanding! You quoted my post so I figured it was in direct reply to the comment I made.

[LF]

Nottingham Hoods give : Jesse Lonergan
Bradford Badgers give : Jesse White

Basically I need another forward I can start as I have some very injury prone forwards and not much reliable backup
Whatlez needs some more mids as his mid depth is lacking

[Justin Bieber]

Nottingham Hoods give : Jesse Lonergan
Bradford Badgers give : Jesse White

Basically I need another forward I can start as I have some very injury prone forwards and not much reliable backup
Whatlez needs some more mids as his mid depth is lacking

Sorry specky but Yolo
Confirmed lol

[specky92]

Nottingham Hoods give : Jesse Lonergan
Bradford Badgers give : Jesse White

Basically I need another forward I can start as I have some very injury prone forwards and not much reliable backup
Whatlez needs some more mids as his mid depth is lacking

Sorry specky but Yolo
Confirmed lol

hahah, oh well,

[Memphistopheles]

Seriously that is annoying.

Just wasted a week with trades.

Also are we reverting back to the original scoring system?

Vote said tomorrow night was the deadline?

How many list movements do we have now Ringo?

[Nige]

Seriously that is annoying.

Just wasted a week with trades.

Also are we reverting back to the original scoring system?

Vote said tomorrow night was the deadline?

How many list movements do we have now Ringo?

Ringo posted this in the other thread.

Please read Carefully and then discuss.

As it is evident with the current vote that we wish to use the Sportal Scoring system (not quite a mjority at this stage with only 10 coaches voted so far) I have mad the following rulings after looking at the approved trades so far.

1. All trades that have been approved as a result of previous announcements have now been cancelled and will have to be renegotiated:  Trades 61 - 66 have been marked cancelled in the thread,

2. As we are reverting to our Original scoring system No additional trade movements will now be allowed.  Consider this reasonable given that we are now using the same system so all previous trades were made on that basis.

3. Trading will be extended to Wednesday 5th March to allow renegotiation time.

4. Reinforcing that players picked in Rookie and national Draft will count as a trade movement

For information here are the trade movements that are now current:

List Movements
Birmingham Bombers 10
Blackpool Bunnies 5
Bradford Badgers 8
Crosby Cruisers 9
Grope Lane Giants 0
Hastings Hurricanes 7
Hebden Bridge Hedgehogs 4
Huddersfield Hawks 9
Leeds Leeches 3
Liverpool Rams 12
Manchester Magic 5
Newcastle Falcons 10
Nottingham Hoods 6
Oxford Owls 10
Staines Steins 6
Swansea Breakers 8
Swindon Swaggers 6
Winchester Werewolves 7

So Bombers, Rams, Falcons and Owls have utilised all movements and can make no more tardes unless on trading players traded in.

May seem unfair but as we are reverting back to our original rules this should be the rules as well.

Could you all check your team lists in the OP of this thread as these are the lists  I have after cancellation of trades:

http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,87321.0.html

The vote was put out, if people vote Option B, we'll be back using Sportal.

[Memphistopheles]

What's the ruling then on the new coaches?

Were we allowed any extra movements? Or not? Did we have any extra because of where we finished on the ladder? Or not?

I'm finding it hard to work out this information.

Can you instead list how many list movements clubs have left rather than saying how many they have used. As it's different for a lot of teams due to where the finished on the ladder?

I count that we have one extra movement we can use with anyone? So that's 4 trades with anyone who has list movements left and 1 with anyone we like? Is that correct?

Also FYI if the scoring system is back to the old one then the trade of Seedsman for Shiel and Paine for Sam Reid should be counted as they were two I did for the Cruisers BEFORE the other trade period closed.