WXV Trade Thread

[Ricochet]

Rocky losing fwd status so Holz needing a gun fwd replacement...

Seems like I won that trade after all ;)

Haha looks that way now

[CrowsFan]

Rocky losing fwd status so Holz needing a gun fwd replacement...

Yet he then trades away 2 more forwards. Don't think that is a valid reason sorry

[Jay]

Rocky losing fwd status so Holz needing a gun fwd replacement...

Seems like I won that trade after all ;)

Haha looks that way now

And Sam Day gained DPP ;D

[Nige]

Rocky losing fwd status so Holz needing a gun fwd replacement...

Yet he then trades away 2 more forwards. Don't think that is a valid reason sorry

[Holz]

Sorry but what is the positional change reasoning behind this trade? As far as I can tell there isn't a change in position to allow the trade to go ahead...

That and Holz is giving Mitch Clark despite calling his forward line shaky. Also, he's adding Dal Santo who is > Fyfe.

in what world is NDS > Fyfe.

Fyfe went 108 at 19, he still wasnt 100% this year and averaged 106. He will shortly join the super premo category. NDS is 29 and will still pick up a hard tag. Im expecting Fyfe to smash him. Most people i asked to said Fyfe > Buddy and I agree.

the mitch clark issue is yes he could be very good but he isnt a solid forward by any means. If i had rocky i would have 5 solid forwards and mitch clark. Without rocky I have 4 solid forwards so mitch clark as cover isnt too strong.

Already told ossie last trade period that I was 50/50 on rocky keeping dpp and I would have done this trade last period but was waiting on the result and would trade accordingly.

If Rocky lost DPP I would get buddy if he didnt i wouldnt trade.

[Nails]

Rocky losing fwd status so Holz needing a gun fwd replacement...

Yet he then trades away 2 more forwards. Don't think that is a valid reason sorry

[Holz]

Rocky losing fwd status so Holz needing a gun fwd replacement...

Yet he then trades away 2 more forwards. Don't think that is a valid reason sorry

top teams getting scared, watch this trade get rejected for that reason ;)

[Nails]

This trade period is to fix holes/add depth to where you're missing due to DPP

It's in the rules, simple as that

You're claiming a missing forward through DPP, therefore your trade needs to net 1 forward or more, not involve trading away your forward line.

[Holz]

This trade period is to fix holes/add depth to where you're missing due to DPP

It's in the rules, simple as that

You're claiming a missing forward through DPP, therefore your trade needs to net 1 forward or more, not involve trading away your forward line.

not how I look at it

I traded a Star Midfielder and a good Forward for a Star Forward and a Good Midfielder.

Are you saying Buddy and Mitch Clark are even a comparison?

[Master Q]

Rocky losing fwd status so Holz needing a gun fwd replacement...

Yet he then trades away 2 more forwards. Don't think that is a valid reason sorry

Maybe he has  another trade on the cards?

[ossie85]

Big Dublin win imo

Are we actually allowed to post trades? Ossie never said it in this thread?

Yeah, go ahead and post :)

[Ringo]

Correct me if I am wrong changing DPP is to be the reason for trades this period.

This is the rule Ossie quoted "A trade can only be allowed if at least one of the players involved had a position change, or there was a reasonable expectation they were going to have a position change, but didn't."

According to that rule and Rockliff is the reason given should not Rockliff be involved in the trade. May be reading the rule incorrectly but do not think so,

[Nige]

Rocky losing fwd status so Holz needing a gun fwd replacement...

Yet he then trades away 2 more forwards. Don't think that is a valid reason sorry

Maybe he has  another trade on the cards?

Nah, Holz is trying to make his 2014 team as good as he can for a premiership tilt this season.

[Nails]

This trade period is to fix holes/add depth to where you're missing due to DPP

It's in the rules, simple as that

You're claiming a missing forward through DPP, therefore your trade needs to net 1 forward or more, not involve trading away your forward line.

not how I look at it

I traded a Star Midfielder and a good Forward for a Star Forward and a Good Midfielder.

Are you saying Buddy and Mitch Clark are even a comparison?

You're trading 3 players

2 forwards for 1 forward

which perpetuates your supposed DPP issues, not fixes them. This period is to fix wholes, not make them bigger.






RE: Ringo

I'm not sure if the player has to be involved in the trade or not (I was under the impression he just had to be sighted as the reason why) i.e. you're filling up a gap made by Steve Johnson so you're trading a midfielder to get af orward

[Nige]

Correct me if I am wrong changing DPP is to be the reason for trades this period.

This is the rule Ossie quoted "A trade can only be allowed if at least one of the players involved had a position change, or there was a reasonable expectation they were going to have a position change, but didn't."

According to that rule and Rockliff is the reason given should not Rockliff be involved in the trade. May be reading the rule incorrectly but do not think so,

Nah Rocky doesn't have to be involved, but it doesn't change the fact that Holz is trading out a forward while labeling his forward line 'shaky', even if he is trading in another.