WXV Trade Thread

[Holz]

Holz, how can you say we have the worst depth? Considering 6 ohave many guys in our best XV were injured/suspended consistently, yest most weeks we could put a team of 15 up. Its rubbish and you know that holz.

Because what your missing is a bench of young guys with potential to turn Into best 22 players or at least play 10 or so games. Guys like lachy Hansen and Aaron black turned from guys who never played for me to best 22 players.

Your alright for now but soon you will be in major trouble.

[Holz]

Holz, how can you say we have the worst depth? Considering 6 or 7 guys in our best XV were injured/suspended consistently, yest most weeks we could put a team of 15 up. Its rubbish and you know that holz.

Well that's not really true, you were struggling to field a side for many weeks!

My team had an average of 22.85 players play per week (not counting bye weeks), so I always had plenty of choices. The only time I dropped below 21 players named was in the semi final against you when I only had 18 play. The max I had play in a week was 27. That's what you call depth ;)

Your team is amazing best list in the comp easy.

[elephants]

All these opinions, facts and stats... They're all irrelevant.

NDT dominates all.

Thanks.

;)

[Purple 77]

Well, my plan is to make the eight, lets say I do finish eight, then win my way to the premiership with captain Jack Steven scoring 150+ in each final. The remaining 14 will get inspired by him every week and they too will lift, and my team will peak in finals and BOOM, Berlin premiership

:D

[kilbluff1985]

My plan is to get Judd to play Chicken Wing with Jack Steven to put him out for the season and ruin your plan lol

Just a joke don't actually wish for players to get injured

[CrowsFan]

My plan is for Ablett to be given forward status. Then I would be unstoppable! :P

[Nige]

My plan is to not have a plan because planning is overrated and time consuming.  :P

[kilbluff1985]

My plan is to not have a plan because planning is overrated and time consuming.  :P

Speaking of time consuming I though proof reading everyones posts would take a bit of a time lol

[MajorLazer]

My plan is to not have a plan because planning is overrated and time consuming.  :P

It's good to see we are on the same page with our plans Nige. ;)

[Nige]

My plan is to not have a plan because planning is overrated and time consuming.  :P

It's good to see we are on the same page with our plans Nige. ;)

See guys, we're so in sync that we don't even notify each other of our plans.

;) ;D 8)

[Master Q]

even though we've added like 3-5 22 game players to our team list at the expense of none?

IN: Michael Walters, Nat Fyfe, Grant Birchall, Charlie Dixon, Bob Murphy, Shuan Grigg, Jobe Watson, Tom Rockliff

OUt: Jesee Hogan, Sam Docherty, Jaeger OMeara, Aaron Black, Shuan Atley, Zach Clarke, Jed Anderson, Jed Lamb, Brad HIll, Lachy Plowman, Jack Redden, Michael Hurley, Sam Day, Lots of Picks.

So have gained 8 best 22 players

and have lost only 5-6 guys who were best 22 last year.

Do you even have 15 players on your list?  :P

[Holz]

even though we've added like 3-5 22 game players to our team list at the expense of none?

IN: Michael Walters, Nat Fyfe, Grant Birchall, Charlie Dixon, Bob Murphy, Shuan Grigg, Jobe Watson, Tom Rockliff

OUt: Jesee Hogan, Sam Docherty, Jaeger OMeara, Aaron Black, Shuan Atley, Zach Clarke, Jed Anderson, Jed Lamb, Brad HIll, Lachy Plowman, Jack Redden, Michael Hurley, Sam Day, Lots of Picks.

So have gained 8 best 22 players

and have lost only 5-6 guys who were best 22 last year.

Do you even have 15 players on your list?  :P

Will be taking lots of Nat picks no doubt

[JBs-Hawks]

Holz, how can you say we have the worst depth? Considering 6 or 7 guys in our best XV were injured/suspended consistently, yest most weeks we could put a team of 15 up. Its rubbish and you know that holz.

2nd Worst :P

Reserves
         
Position   Name   Score   Scored Against   Wins   Loses   Percentage
1   Rhineland Rum-Runners   2132   1219   15   2   174.90
2   Alexandria Hieroglyphics   2402   1594   13   4   150.69
3   Mexico City Suns   1853   1269   12   5   146.02
4   Toronto Wolves   1860   1431   12   5   129.98
5   Cape Town Cobras   1826   1516   12   5   120.45
6   Imperial Princes   2062   1598   10   7   129.04
7   Rio de Janeiro Jaguars   1737   1599   10   7   108.63
8   Port Morseby Iguanadons   1519   1475   10   7   102.98
9   Marseille Kings   1568   1605   10   7   97.69
10   Belfast Braves   1123   1299   10   7   86.45
11   Wellington Warriors   1318   1269   9   8   103.86
12   Pyongyang Chollimas   1403   1310   8   9   107.10
13   Washington Rebellion   1274   1316   7   10   96.81
14   Siberian Wolverines   1193   1461   6   11   81.66
15   Mumbai Elephants   588   1395   4   13   42.15
16   Yuzawa Typhoon   822   1289   2   15   63.77
17   Buenos Aires Armadillos   509   1332   2   15   38.21
18   Shanghai Storm   407   1619   1   16   25.14

[ossie85]

4 teams left to vote!

Same ol' stragglers --> Hellopplz, Maca24, pothead, pyronerd/Sid

People need to VOTE by 11:59pm Monday to avoid possible sanctions - particularly Maca24

But none of the votes will change the outcomes, but would be good for the record, the trade results are:


Trades Passed Fully (2 votes or less)
* These trades passed, with or without my objection

Trade 31:

Moscow trade: Shaun Higgins and Alex Sexton
Cape Town trade: Lynden Dunn and Pick 33

Trade 33:

Berlin trade: Lachlan Henderson and Pick 60
Toronto trade: Dayne Zorko

Trades Fully Rejected (9 votes or more)
* These trades passed, with or without my support

Nil

Trades Passed by the Coaches, but referred to me (3 votes or more)

Nil

Trades Rejected by the Coaches, but referred to me (8 votes or less)

Trade 32:

Pacific trade: Tom Nicholls
New York trade: Josh Jenkins and Pick 8

Verdict: A lot of doubt from coaches of whether or not Nicholls (a ruck averaging 92 from 8 matches, including 2 centuries) and Jenkins (a ruckmen/forward who averaged 69, including 3 centirues) were roughly equal given Nicholls is still seen as not a #1 ruck. Pick 8 was seen as overkill. I tend to agree with these doubts, at least to an extent where I'm not confident overturning the people's decision REJECTED


Trades Rejected for other reasons

Nil

[Jay]

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaat?

So my previous trade, 'Tom Nicholls, Daniel Talia and Pick 60 FOR Pick 5 and Pick 44' was rejected because I was giving up too much... And now Nicholls FOR Jenkins + pick 8 is rejected because I gain too much?

Jenkins will lose DPP anyway, he'll just be a fwd and who knows how pick 8 will turn out, could be a spud! Nicholls is a quality young ruck who averaged 92 sub affected, his true average is 100ppg.

Cannot for the life of me see how both trades got rejected! Is it worth trying to find a deal for Nicholls in between my first one and this one? Will probably just get rejected again :-X